Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Funding, evaluation, and the performance of national research systems
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Industrial Economics and Management (Dept.), Sustainability and Industrial Dynamics. (Hållbarhet och Industriell Dynamik)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1292-8239
2018 (English)In: Journal of Informetrics, ISSN 1751-1577, E-ISSN 1875-5879, Vol. 12, no 1, p. 365-384Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Understanding the quality of science systems requires international comparative studies, which are difficult because of the lack of comparable data especially about inputs in research. In this study, we deploy an approach based on change instead of on levels of inputs and outputs: an approach that to a large extent eliminates the problem of measurement differences between countries. We firstly show that there are large differences in efficiency between national science systems, defined as the increase in output (highly cited papers) per percentage increase in input (funding). We then discuss our findings using popular explanations of performance differences: differences in funding systems (performance related or not), differences in the level of competition, differences in the level of university autonomy, and differences in the level of academic freedom. Interestingly, the available data do not support these common explanations. What the data suggest is that efficient systems are characterized by a well-developed ex post evaluation system combined with considerably high institutional funding and relatively low university autonomy (meaning a high autonomy of professionals). On the other hand, the less efficient systems have a strong ex ante control, either through a high level of so-called competitive project funding, or through strong power of the university management. Another conclusion is that more and better data are needed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. Vol. 12, no 1, p. 365-384
Keywords [en]
Research policy; Input-output studies; Performance-based funding; Research efficiency; Bibliometrics; Citations
National Category
Social Sciences
Research subject
Industrial Economics and Management
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-223588DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2018.01.007ISI: 000427479800026Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85042382770OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-223588DiVA, id: diva2:1185146
Funder
Riksbankens Jubileumsfond, P12-1302:1
Note

QC 20180308

Available from: 2018-02-23 Created: 2018-02-23 Last updated: 2018-05-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopusForskningspolitik.se

Authority records BETA

Sandström, Ulf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sandström, Ulf
By organisation
Sustainability and Industrial Dynamics
In the same journal
Journal of Informetrics
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 93 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf