Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Swedish Vision Zero policies for safety – A comparative policy content analysis
Philosophy and History, KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Philosophy and History of Technology, Philosophy.
2018 (English)In: Safety Science, ISSN 0925-7535, E-ISSN 1879-1042, Vol. 103, p. 260-269Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The Vision Zero policy was adopted by the Swedish parliament in 1997 as a new direction for road traffic safety. The aim of the policy is that no one should be killed or seriously injured due to traffic accidents and that the design of the road transport system should be adapted to those requirements. Vision Zero has been described as a policy innovation with a focus on the tolerance of the human body to kinetic energy and that the responsibility for road safety falls on the system designers. In Sweden, the Vision Zero terminology has spread to other safety-related areas, such as fire safety, patient safety, workplace safety and suicide. The purpose of this article is to analyze, through a comparative content analysis, each Vision Zero policy by identifying the policy decision, policy problem, policy goal, and policy measures. How a policy is designed and formulated has a direct effect on implementation and outcome. The similarities and differences between the policies give an indication of the transfer method in each case. The results show that the Vision Zero policies following the Vision Zero for road traffic contain more than merely a similar terminology, but also that the ideas incorporated in Vision Zero are not grounded within each policy area as one would expect. The study shows that it is easier to imitate formulations in a seemingly successful policy and harder to transform Vision Zero into a workable tool in each policy area. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier B.V. , 2018. Vol. 103, p. 260-269
Keywords [en]
Fire safety, Patient safety, Road traffic safety, Suicide, Vision Zero policy, Workplace safety, Accident prevention, Highway accidents, Highway planning, Kinetic energy, Kinetics, Motor transportation, Roads and streets, Safety engineering, Terminology, Transportation, Vision Zero, Occupational risks
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-223136DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.11.005ISI: 000424722000024Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85038092986OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-223136DiVA, id: diva2:1193456
Note

Export Date: 13 February 2018; Article; CODEN: SSCIE; Correspondence Address: Kristianssen, A.-C.; Centre for Public Safety, Karlstad UniversitySweden; email: ann-catrin.kristianssen@kau.se. QC 20180327

Available from: 2018-03-27 Created: 2018-03-27 Last updated: 2018-03-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Belin, Matts-Åke
By organisation
Philosophy
In the same journal
Safety Science
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 8 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf