Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Partnering: definition, theory and evaluation
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Real Estate and Construction Management, Building and Real Estate Economics.
2007 (English)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other scientific)
Abstract [en]

The concept of partnering in the construction industry stands for a collaborative way of working. Examples of partnering projects can be found on every continent. As suggested in the title this thesis makes contributions to three areas of partnering research: the definition of partnering, the theory behind partnering and how to evaluate the effects of the concept.

The thesis consists of six papers with the following main results. A new definition of the concept is provided with the partnering flower in the first paper. This definition model is a concrete, flexible and structured way to define partnering. It forces people to concretise and pinpoint which components they include in partnering in a specific setting. The second paper uses contract theory to understand how partnering can be justified from an efficiency perspective. Partnering can either be seen as something that neutralises opportunism when there is an incomplete contract or something that reduces transaction costs for renegotiation of complete contracts when new information arises. Paper 3 is an empirical study of attitudes towards partnering in the Swedish construction industry, which complements the preceding studies. Among the results can be mentioned that support for the definition of partnering presented in paper 1 is found and that most respondents do not see partnering just as a new fad - a result that is consistent from 2004 to 2006. With the theory and the definition settled, it remains to evaluate the effects of partnering. This is done in two steps. The first step (in paper 4) is through reviewing earlier evaluations and providing suggestions on how the assessments can be improved. One of these suggestions is applied in paper 5, with a quasi-experimental evaluation of partnering comparing ten partnering projects to ten similar non-partnering projects. With improved data, mainly based on site meeting minutes, and a more well-founded method, no support can be found for the strong positive outcome of partnering reported in earlier evaluations. The final paper makes a contribution to economic contract theory by questioning one of the essential assumptions in this literature, the distinction between observable and verifiable characteristics. This aspect surfaced during the study of partnering contracts and contract theory.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: KTH , 2007. , 180 p.
Series
Trita-BFE, ISSN 1104-4101 ; 2007:78
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-4355ISBN: 978-91-975984-6-0 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-4355DiVA: diva2:11936
Public defence
2007-05-10, Sal F3, KTH, Lindstedtsvägen 26, Stockholm, 13:15
Opponent
Supervisors
Note
QC 20100811Available from: 2007-05-04 Created: 2007-05-04 Last updated: 2010-09-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1479 kB)1558 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1479 kBChecksum MD5
95f11190187c245d052484b68ddb21e58f0b9576b3b1ce06727078ad4c2170e0d70b0b0e
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nyström, Johan
By organisation
Building and Real Estate Economics
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1558 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 890 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf