Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Techno-economic feasibility of integrating energy storage systems in refrigerated warehouses
Tianjin Univ Commerce, Tianjin Key Lab Refrigerat Technol, Tianjin 300134, Peoples R China..
Tianjin Univ Commerce, Tianjin Key Lab Refrigerat Technol, Tianjin 300134, Peoples R China.;Tianjin Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Tianjin 300350, Peoples R China.;Malardalen Univ, Sch Business Soc & Engn, SE-72123 Vastras, Sweden..
Malardalen Univ, Sch Business Soc & Engn, SE-72123 Vastras, Sweden.;KTH Royal Inst Technol, Sch Chem Sci & Engn, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden..
Tianjin Univ Commerce, Tianjin Key Lab Refrigerat Technol, Tianjin 300134, Peoples R China.;Malardalen Univ, Sch Business Soc & Engn, SE-72123 Vastras, Sweden..
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: Applied Energy, ISSN 0306-2619, E-ISSN 1872-9118, Vol. 216, p. 348-357Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This work evaluates the techno-economic feasibility of integrating the cold energy storage system and the electrical energy storage system in a refrigerated warehouse for shifting the power consumption. A dynamic model has been developed in TRNSYS (R). Based on the dynamic simulation, the performance and benefit of those two types of energy storage systems were compared. Results showed that, the integration of a cold energy storage can reduce the electricity consumption and operational cost by 4.3% and 20.5%, respectively. Even though integrating a battery system will increase the electricity consumption by 3.9%, it can reduce the operational cost by 18.7%. The capacity of the energy storage systems, the battery price and the peak electricity price had been identified as key parameters affecting the performance and benefit. To achieve a payback period less than 3 year, for the integration of a cold energy storage system, the peak electricity price should be increased by 25% from the current level, while for the integration of a battery system, the battery price should drop to 0.7 kRMB/kWh.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2018. Vol. 216, p. 348-357
Keywords [en]
Refrigerated warehouses, Electricity consumption shifting, Cold energy storage, Battery, Dynamic simulation and optimization, Payback period
National Category
Energy Systems
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-226754DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.01.079ISI: 000429761700027Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85042331320OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-226754DiVA, id: diva2:1201807
Conference
Joint Conference of the World Engineers Summit / Applied Energy Symposium and Forum - Low Carbon Cities and Urban Energy (WES-CUE), JUL 19-21, 2017, Singapore
Funder
Knowledge Foundation
Note

QC 20180426

Available from: 2018-04-26 Created: 2018-04-26 Last updated: 2018-04-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Yan, Jinyue

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Yan, Jinyue
By organisation
School of Chemical Science and Engineering (CHE)
In the same journal
Applied Energy
Energy Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 5 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf