Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Political legitimacy and the unreliability of language
Philosophy and History, KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Philosophy and History of Technology, Philosophy.
2016 (English)In: Public Reason, ISSN 2065-7285, E-ISSN 2065-8958, Vol. 8, no 1-2, p. 81-89Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Many political theorists in current debates have argued that pragmatist theories of mind and language place certain constraints on our normative political theories. In a couple of papers, we have accused these pragmatically influenced political theorists of misapplication of otherwise perfectly valid ideas. In a recent paper, one of the targets of our critique, Thomas Fossen, has retorted that we have misrepresented the role that a pragmatist theory of language plays in these accounts. In this paper, we claim that Fossen’s attempt to chisel out a role for his account in normative political theory rehearses the same problematic view of the utility of theories of language as his previous iterations. We argue that Fossen’s account is still guilty of the fallacious claim that a pragmatist theory of language (in his case Robert Brandom’s account) has implications for the form and justification of theories of political legitimacy. We specifically focus on three flaws with his current reply: the idea that criteria and conditions are problematic on a pragmatist outlook, the idea that a pragmatist linguistic account applied to a particular political context will have a distinct political-theoretical payoff, and the idea that a fundamental linguistic level of analysis supplies normative guidance for theorizing political legitimacy.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
University of Bucharest , 2016. Vol. 8, no 1-2, p. 81-89
Keywords [en]
Political legitimacy, Pragmatism, Robert Brandom, Theories of language
National Category
Philosophy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-227899Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85042327695OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-227899DiVA, id: diva2:1206208
Note

QC 20180516

Export Date: 14 May 2018; Article; Funding details: STINT, Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education; Funding text: Eva Erman wishes to thank the Swedish Research Council and Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg Foundation for the generous funding of her research.

Available from: 2018-05-16 Created: 2018-05-16 Last updated: 2018-05-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

ScopusFree full text

Authority records BETA

Möller, Niklas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Möller, Niklas
By organisation
Philosophy
In the same journal
Public Reason
Philosophy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 44 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf