Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Artefacts for understanding
KTH, Superseded Departments, Numerical Analysis and Computer Science, NADA.
KTH, Superseded Departments, Numerical Analysis and Computer Science, NADA.
2004 (English)In: Working papers in Art and Design, 2004: Research into practice conference, 2004, Vol. 3Conference paper, Published paper (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2004. Vol. 3
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-7493OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-7493DiVA: diva2:12536
Note
QC 20100519Available from: 2007-09-21 Created: 2007-09-21 Last updated: 2012-03-22Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Perspectives on Cooperative Design
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Perspectives on Cooperative Design
2007 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other scientific)
Abstract [en]

The cooperative design approach, which research and practice have proven to be successful in several ways, is based on understanding users and their contexts through a variety of methods. This approach of working closely together with the users, however, is not the same thing as letting the users decide themselves what to design. Rather it means that designers in an interdisciplinary research team, working in close collaboration with the users, will use their design skills and collected knowledge about the users to produce good designs. Though cooperative design has proven successful, there are ways in which it could be improved.

Cooperative design derived as a result of criticism about the lack of focus on users in the design process. In this sense, cooperative design has been the critical view, whereas socio-cultural perspectives such as gender, values and power relations have been either suppressed, deliberately or not, or not taken into consideration to the full extent that they could be. In contrast, three important elements of cultural studies research are meaning, identity and power. Research in this field examines the relationship between people and context, and between cultural and social practices, as well as on forces that change or preserve power structures. One aim of this thesis is to emphasise the importance of these issues within cooperative design.

The focus of my thesis is to, through a phenomenological approach and a critical view of the different cooperative design projects I have participated in, discuss issues that have either been part of the projects’ structure, or have been imposed on the projects by circumstances that perhaps could not be foreseen. Three main issues that need further investigation to understand how they affect the design process are discussed: language and meaning, the individual in the group-oriented activities of cooperative design, and finally power relations and structures. I use myself as the subject through which the socio-cultural and critical viewpoints are shown. My aim is to show that there are aspects of the individual researcher in the cooperative design process that impact the design space and design.

Through a critical discussion of the projects and related issues, this thesis argues that the cooperative design process can involve data and methods that we do not always know how to handle. As a result, we can miss important aspects of the research or end up in difficult dilemmas. Therefore, we need to better understand on what grounds we make design decisions in the cooperative design process, investigate what effect the individual has in group-oriented design processes, and examine how culture, language and power structures guide us and how we use methods such as triangulation. I believe that researchers need to evaluate our cooperative design process from the outside, with the goal of improving these processes.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: KTH, 2007. vi, 96 p.
Series
Trita-CSC-A, ISSN 1653-5723 ; 2007:13
Keyword
Cooperative design, design process, culture, individual, intersectionality, power structure, triangulation
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-4495 (URN)978-91-7178-757-6 (ISBN)
Public defence
2007-10-11, F3, Lindstedtsvägen 23, KTH, Stockholm, 00:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Note
QC 20100519Available from: 2007-09-21 Created: 2007-09-21 Last updated: 2012-03-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

research into practice

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lindquist, SinnaWesterlund, Bo
By organisation
Numerical Analysis and Computer Science, NADA
Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 80 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf