Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Quantifying energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions of road infrastructure projects: An LCA case study of the Oslo fjord crossing in Norway
Univ Agder, Fac Sci & Engn, Jon Lilletunsvei 9, Grimstad, Norway..
Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Energy & Proc Engn, Sem Sxlands Vei 7, Trondheim, Norway..ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8095-1663
Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Energy & Proc Engn, Sem Sxlands Vei 7, Trondheim, Norway..
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Sustainable development, Environmental science and Engineering. Royal Inst Technol KTH, Div Environm Strategies Res, Stockholm, Sweden..ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7040-4623
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, ISSN 1567-7133, E-ISSN 1567-7141, Vol. 16, no 3, p. 445-466Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The road sector consumes large amounts of materials and energy and produces large quantities of greenhouse gas emissions, which can be reduced with correct information in the early planning stages of road project. An important aspect in the early planning stages is the choice between alternative road corridors that will determine the route distance and the subsequent need for different road infrastructure elements, such as bridges and tunnels. Together, these factors may heavily influence the life cycle environmental impacts of the road project. This paper presents a case study for two prospective road corridor alternatives for the Oslo fjord crossing in Norway and utilizes in a streamlined model based on life cycle assessment principles to quantify cumulative energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions for each route. This technique can be used to determine potential environmental impacts of road projects by overcoming several challenges in the early planning stages, such as the limited availability of detailed life cycle inventory data on the consumption of material and energy inputs, large uncertainty in the design and demand for road infrastructure elements, as well as in future traffic and future vehicle technologies. The results show the importance of assessing different life cycle activities, input materials, fuels and the critical components of such a system. For the Oslo fjord case, traffic during operation contributes about 94 % and 89 % of the annual CED and about 98 % and 92 % of the annual GHG emissions, for a tunnel and a bridge fjord crossing alternative respectively.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
EDITORIAL BOARD EJTIR , 2016. Vol. 16, no 3, p. 445-466
Keywords [en]
cumulative energy demand, greenhouse gas emissions, life cycle assessment (LCA), road infrastructure, road planning
National Category
Civil Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-242648ISI: 000384746600002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84970028602OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-242648DiVA, id: diva2:1291379
Note

QC 20190225

Available from: 2019-02-25 Created: 2019-02-25 Last updated: 2019-02-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Scopus

Authority records BETA

Miliutenko, SofiiaPotting, José

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Brattebo, HelgeMiliutenko, SofiiaPotting, José
By organisation
Sustainable development, Environmental science and EngineeringEnvironmental Strategies Research (fms)
In the same journal
European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research
Civil Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 14 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf