Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
How should we evaluate complex programmes for innovation and socio-technical transitions?
Philosophy and History, KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Philosophy and History of Technology, History of Science, Technology and Environment.
2018 (English)Report (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Brighton: technopolis |group| United Kingdom , 2018. , p. 94
National Category
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
Research subject
History of Science, Technology and Environment
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-250284OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-250284DiVA, id: diva2:1307595
Note

QC 20190520

Available from: 2019-04-28 Created: 2019-04-28 Last updated: 2019-05-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Report

Authority records BETA

Arnold, Erik

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Arnold, Erik
By organisation
History of Science, Technology and Environment
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 80 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf