Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The value of BIM in a healthcare construction project : a multi-actor perspective
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Real Estate and Construction Management, Project Communication.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2309-9958
Uppsala University.
2018 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Construction projects constitute a highly complex and fragmented project environment where a variety of stakeholders are forced to interact and collaborate during the various phases of the project process. In enhancing collaboration and communication among project stakeholders Building Information Modelling (BIM) has been identified as important tool, however the implementation and use of BIM as a collaborative tool has been more difficult and time-consuming than anticipated. The aim of the study is to investigate how various project stakeholders perceive the value of BIM in a large construction project by using and applying the Industrial Network Approach (INA). An in-depth case study of a Swedish healthcare project was performed through interviews with main stakeholders of the project. The results indicate that each stakeholder perceives the value of BIM from their own perspective and role in the project. The perceived value of BIM is closely connected to the changes and adjustments that each stakeholder have to do in order to use BIM; for some stakeholders BIM cause an increased work load, while for others’ BIM facilitated their work processes. The diverging perspectives of the value of BIM and the associated changes among the various project stakeholders provide a deeper understanding to why the implementation and use of BIM is challenging.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018.
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-250334OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-250334DiVA, id: diva2:1307867
Conference
ARCOM
Note

QCR 20190624

Available from: 2019-04-29 Created: 2019-04-29 Last updated: 2019-06-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records BETA

Havenvid, Malena Ingemansson

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Havenvid, Malena Ingemansson
By organisation
Project Communication
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 99 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf