Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Benchmarking worldwide airport connectivity with demand data: Global hub competition, new players, and the hidden potential of self-connectivity
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Transport Science.
2017 (English)In: Volume 6 - The Economics of Airport Operations, Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. , 2017, p. 387-423Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The connectivity provided by full-service network carriers under the umbrella of airline alliances is increasingly challenged by the services of Middle Eastern airlines via their own hubs, and the rise of new passenger strategies like self-connectivity. While these two developments can potentially benefit consumers with more services and lower fares, the rise of Middle East carriers has been met with opposition by EU and US airlines that call for increased protectionism. In addition, only a few airports in the world actively support self-connections. In this context, this study aims to investigate (1) the markets in which Middle East carriers exert a stronger dominance in terms of the number of passenger connections, (2) whether EU, US, or Asian hubs provide a competitive quality of connectivity in terms of travel time, and (3) whether a significant potential for self-connections is hidden at major airports worldwide. To that end, several datasets of passenger bookings (MIDT), airline schedules, and minimum connecting times between 2012 and 2015 are combined in a connections-building methodology that delivers six market-specific airport connectivity indicators for our benchmarking exercise. Our findings show that although European and some Asian hubs have lost traffic in global markets, they remain competitive from a quality perspective. US hubs have maintained their market share and competitive position. Finally, we identify the airports and airlines with the highest potential to provide self-connecting travel options, which can become an attractive new source of revenue for the parties involved.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. , 2017. p. 387-423
Keywords [en]
Aviation policy, Connectivity, Gulf carriers, Hub competition
National Category
Transport Systems and Logistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-251792DOI: 10.1108/S2212-160920170000006015Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85064713196ISBN: 978-1-78714-498-9 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-251792DiVA, id: diva2:1318160
Note

QC 20190527

Available from: 2019-05-27 Created: 2019-05-27 Last updated: 2019-05-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rodríguez-Déniz, H.
By organisation
Transport Science
Transport Systems and Logistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 12 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf