Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
An empirical survey on co-simulation: Promising standards, challenges and research needs
Graz Univ Technol, Graz, Austria..
Univ Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium..
Graz Univ Technol, Graz, Austria..
Dwh GmbH Simulat Serv & Tech Solut, Vienna, Austria..
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: Simulation (San Diego, Calif.), ISSN 1569-190X, E-ISSN 1878-1462, Vol. 95, p. 148-163Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Co-simulation is a promising approach for the modelling and simulation of complex systems, that makes use of mature simulation tools in the respective domains. It has been applied in various different domains, oftentimes without a comprehensive study of the impact to the simulation results. As a consequence, over the recent years, researchers have set out to understand the essential challenges arising from the application of this technique. This paper complements the existing surveys in that the social and empirical aspects were addressed. More than 50 experts participated in a two-stage Delphi study to determine current challenges, research needs and promising standards and tools. Furthermore, an analysis of the strengths, weakness, opportunities and threats of co-simulation utilizing the analytic hierarchy process resulting in a SWOT-AHP analysis is presented. The empirical results of this study show that experts consider the FMI standard to be the most promising standard for continuous time, discrete event and hybrid cosimulation. The results of the SWOT-AHP analysis indicate that factors related to strengths and opportunities predominate.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2019. Vol. 95, p. 148-163
Keywords [en]
Co-simulation, Modelling, Simulation, Delphi method, Empirical survey
National Category
Other Engineering and Technologies not elsewhere specified
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-254064DOI: 10.1016/j.simpat.2019.05.001ISI: 000470680800010Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85065665145OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-254064DiVA, id: diva2:1327929
Note

QC 20190620

Available from: 2019-06-20 Created: 2019-06-20 Last updated: 2019-06-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Schoeggl, J.
By organisation
KTH
In the same journal
Simulation (San Diego, Calif.)
Other Engineering and Technologies not elsewhere specified

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 2 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf