Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A rapid smartphone-based lactate dehydrogenase test for neonatal diagnostics at the point of care
Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Res & Educ, Sodersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.;Sachs Children & Youth Hosp, Neonatal Unit, Stockholm, Sweden..
Karolinska Inst, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Stockholm, Sweden.;Karolinska Inst, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Stockholm, Sweden.;TRAC Sweden Vietnam, Hanoi, Vietnam..
Calmark Sweden AB, Stockholm, Sweden..
Calmark Sweden AB, Stockholm, Sweden.;Uppsala Univ, Dept Med Sci Biomed Struct & Funct, Uppsala, Sweden..
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: Scientific Reports, ISSN 2045-2322, E-ISSN 2045-2322, Vol. 9, article id 9301Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

There is a growing recognition of the importance of point-of-care tests (POCTs) for detecting critical neonatal illnesses to reduce the mortality rate in newborns, especially in low-income countries, which account for 98 percent of reported neonatal deaths. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is a marker of cellular damage as a result of hypoxia-ischemia in affected organs. Here, we describe and test a POC LDH test direct from whole blood to provide early indication of serious illness in the neonate. The sample-inresult- out POC platform is specifically designed to meet the needs at resource-limited settings. Plasma is separated from whole blood on filter paper with dried-down reagents for colorimetric reaction, combined with software for analysis using a smartphone. The method was clinically tested in newborns in two different settings. In a clinical cohort of newborns of Stockholm (n = 62) and Hanoi (n = 26), the value of R using Pearson's correlation test was 0.91 (p < 0.01) and the R-2 = 0.83 between the two methods. The mean LDH (+/- SD) for the reference method vs. the POC-LDH was 551 (+/- 280) U/L and 552 (+/- 249) U/L respectively, indicating the clinical value of LDH values measured in minutes with the POC was comparable with standardized laboratory analyses.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Nature Publishing Group, 2019. Vol. 9, article id 9301
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-255307DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-45606-0ISI: 000472837000025PubMedID: 31243323Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85067938114OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-255307DiVA, id: diva2:1339854
Note

QC 20190731

Available from: 2019-07-31 Created: 2019-07-31 Last updated: 2019-07-31Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records BETA

Russom, Aman

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Russom, Aman
By organisation
Protein ScienceScience for Life Laboratory, SciLifeLab
In the same journal
Scientific Reports
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 12 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf