Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Unpacking teachers’ assessment practices in STEM education across countries
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Learning. (Lärande i STEM)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8889-2562
Purdue University.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4847-4526
Purdue University .ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1680-2433
Purdue University.
2019 (English)In: Thinkings Tomorrow's Education: Learning from the past, in the present and for the future. 18th Biennial EARLI Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction.: Symposium. Asessment and evaluation: Learning by making comparative judgements., EARLI, RWTH Aachen University. , 2019, p. 199-Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The perceived demands of the future workforce continue to emphasize a need for enhanced Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) education. An integral, but sometimes overlooked, part of the STEM–education paradigm is Technology and Engineering education (TEE). While TEE differs to some extent across the globe, a common feature is the use of open-ended design tasks as a pedagogical method, which has also become a preferred approach to teaching STEM concepts in an integrated manner. However, these open-ended design tasks remain difficult to assess. Therefore, this paper will explore the potential of using comparative judgement (CJ) to unpack and explicate criteria for success in open-ended design tasks to better inform teachers’ assessment practices in TEE across countries. Results revealed several interesting findings and provoking similarities and differences.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
EARLI, RWTH Aachen University. , 2019. p. 199-
Keywords [en]
Engineering education, Technology education, Assessment methods and tools, secondary education, comparative studies, comparative judgement
Keywords [sv]
teknikutbildning, undervisning, teknikundervisning, bedömning, komparativ bedömning, formativ bedömning
National Category
Educational Sciences
Research subject
Technology and Learning
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-256342OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-256342DiVA, id: diva2:1345143
Conference
18th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction. RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany. August 12–16, 2019
Note

QC 20190827

Available from: 2019-08-23 Created: 2019-08-23 Last updated: 2019-08-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Conference webpage

Authority records BETA

Hartell, Eva

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hartell, EvaStrimel, GregBartholomew, Scott
By organisation
Learning
Educational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 39 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf