Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparison of publication-level approaches to ex-post citation normalization
Umea Univ, Dept Sociol, Inforsk, Umea, Sweden.;Umea Univ, Univ Lib, Umea, Sweden..
KTH, School of Education and Communication in Engineering Science (ECE), Department for Library services, Language and ARC, Library, Publication Infrastructure. Uppsala Univ, Dept Stat, Uppsala, Sweden..ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0229-3073
2019 (English)In: Scientometrics, ISSN 0138-9130, E-ISSN 1588-2861, Vol. 120, no 1, p. 283-300Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In this paper, we compare two sophisticated publication-level approaches to ex-post citation normalization: an item-oriented approach and an approach falling under the general algorithmically constructed classification system approach. Using articles published in core journals in Web of Science (SCIE, SSCI & A&HCI) during 2009 (n=955,639), we first examine, using the measure Proportion explained variation (PEV), to what extent the publication-level approaches can explain and correct for variation in the citation distribution that stems from subject matter heterogeneity. We then, for the subset of articles from life science and biomedicine (n=456,045), gauge the fairness of the normalization approaches with respect to their ability to identify highly cited articles when subject area is factored out. This is done by utilizing information from publication-level MeSH classifications to create high quality subject matter baselines and by using the measure Deviations from expectations (DE). The results show that the item-oriented approach had the best performance regarding PEV. For DE, only the most fine-grained clustering solution could compete with the item-oriented approach. However, the item-oriented approach performed better when cited references were heavily weighted in the similarity calculations.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
SPRINGER , 2019. Vol. 120, no 1, p. 283-300
Keywords [en]
Algorithmically constructed classification system approach, Citation impact, Field normalization, Item-oriented approach, Research evaluation
National Category
Information Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-255179DOI: 10.1007/s11192-019-03121-zISI: 000471656400014Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85066012563OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-255179DiVA, id: diva2:1348441
Note

QC 20190904

Available from: 2019-09-04 Created: 2019-09-04 Last updated: 2020-01-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Ahlgren, Per

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ahlgren, Per
By organisation
Publication Infrastructure
In the same journal
Scientometrics
Information Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 201 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf