Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Factors influencing ergonomists' use of observation-based risk-assessment tools
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health (CBH), Biomedical Engineering and Health Systems, Ergonomics. Uppsala Univ, Dept Med Sci Occupat & Environm Med, Uppsala, Sweden.;Uppsala Univ Hosp, Uppsala, Sweden..
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health (CBH), Biomedical Engineering and Health Systems, Ergonomics.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5979-5504
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health (CBH), Biomedical Engineering and Health Systems, Ergonomics. Uppsala Univ, Dept Med Sci Occupat & Environm Med, Uppsala, Sweden.;Uppsala Univ Hosp, Uppsala, Sweden..ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7099-5352
2019 (English)In: Work: A journal of Prevention, Assessment and rehabilitation, ISSN 1051-9815, E-ISSN 1875-9270, Vol. 64, no 1, p. 93-106Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Several observation-based risk-assessment tools have been developed in recent decades. Studies reporting their use often focus only on the user, the ergonomist. The influence of context and the attributes of the tools may also affect the use but are factors that are seldom considered. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to explore the process of risk-assessment assignments and to identify factors influencing the use of research-based observation-based risk-assessment tools among Swedish ergonomists, with a background as reg. physiotherapists, employed in Occupational Health Services (OHS). METHODS: A web-based questionnaire (n = 70) was combined with semi-structured interviews (n = 12). RESULTS: There was limited use of several observation-based risk-assessment tools. Furthermore, the results showed that ergonomics risk-assessment assignments are most commonly initiated reactively and that interventions were seldom evaluated. Factors that influence use are related both to the ergonomist and to the attributes of the tools as well as to contextual factors assigned to authorities, and internal organisations both within occupational health service companies and client companies. CONCLUSION: There was a lack of systematic approaches in ergonomics risks assessment and low use and knowledge of risk-assessment tools. This indicates that there is a need to support OHS companies in implementing systematic tools in their practice.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IOS PRESS , 2019. Vol. 64, no 1, p. 93-106
Keywords [en]
Ergonomics, occupational health service, musculoskeletal disorders, observation tools, Ottawa model of research use
National Category
Medical Ergonomics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-261986DOI: 10.3233/WOR-192972ISI: 000487235000009PubMedID: 31450532Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85072551666OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-261986DiVA, id: diva2:1360149
Note

QC 20191011

Available from: 2019-10-11 Created: 2019-10-11 Last updated: 2020-01-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records BETA

Eliasson, KristinaCarl, LindNyman, Teresia

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eliasson, KristinaCarl, LindNyman, Teresia
By organisation
Ergonomics
In the same journal
Work: A journal of Prevention, Assessment and rehabilitation
Medical Ergonomics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 44 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf