Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Techno-economic assessment of chemical looping reforming of natural gas for hydrogen production and power generation with integrated CO2 capture
Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4056-0454
Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway;Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, ISSN 1750-5836, E-ISSN 1878-0148, Vol. 78, p. 7-20Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The current study presents the techno-economic analysis of the CLR-CC process. The CLR-CC process comprises of chemical looping reforming (CLR) of Natural Gas, water gas shift, CO2 capture and compression, and combined cycle power plant. A 1-D phenomenological model was developed using MATLAB and is used to study the performance of CLR, whereas the remaining part of the process was analysed using commercial software tools like Aspen and Thermoflow. The effect of design conditions in CLR, mainly the air flowrate to the oxidation reactor, oxidation reactor outlet temperature and the steam flowrate to the fuel reactor of CLR, on the overall techno-economic performance of the CLR-CC process is reported. The CH4 conversion in CLR, net electrical efficiency, CO2 avoidance rate and the Levelised Cost of Electricity (LCOE) have been identified as technoeconomic performance indicators. For the sensitivity study carried out in this study through 12 cases, the net electrical efficiency of the CLR-CC process varies between 40.0 and 43.4%, whereas the LCOE varies between 75.3 and 144.8 $/MWh, which is highly dependent on the fuel cost and process contingency rates.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier , 2018. Vol. 78, p. 7-20
National Category
Energy Systems
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-264377DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.07.022ISI: 000447919600002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85050797211OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-264377DiVA, id: diva2:1373490
Note

QC 20191129

Available from: 2019-11-27 Created: 2019-11-27 Last updated: 2019-11-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

The full text will be freely available from 2020-08-01 15:53
Available from 2020-08-01 15:53

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Nazir, Shareq Mohd

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nazir, Shareq Mohd
In the same journal
International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
Energy Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 5 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf