Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Planning with justice: Using spatial modelling to incorporate justice in electricity pricing - The case of Tanzania
Univ British Columbia, Inst Resources Environm & Sustainabil, AERL Bldg,429-2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada..
Univ British Columbia, Forest Sci Ctr, Dept Forest Resources Management, 2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada..
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Energy Technology, Energy Systems Analysis.
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Energy Technology, Energy Systems Analysis.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0538-7887
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Applied Energy, ISSN 0306-2619, E-ISSN 1872-9118, Vol. 264, article id UNSP 114749Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Universal electrification by 2030 is an important goal of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 7. Electricity provision no longer relies only on centralized grid expansion, but also on off-grid and mini-grid systems. Although this technological diversity holds promise, the technologies differ both physically and institutionally in electricity delivery. These differences raise equity and justice concerns around how they are implemented. For example, how can electricity be kept affordable for all consumers when access is provided by various technologies operated under different business models? This paper addresses this aspect of affordability and sheds light on how the SDG7 target could be met more equitably and fairly. We use a novel analytical methodology to apply two different principles of justice - equality and equity - to incorporate affordability into electricity pricing. Using a geospatial electrification model and Tanzania as a case study, we first arrive at price levels based on the principle(s) of justice. Then, we produce location-specific recommendations for subsidy levels needed to ensure those price levels. We find that the equity approach benefits a bigger section of the population than the equality approach. Moreover, the former costs significantly less per capita than the latter. Having said that, the equity approach is complex and therefore harder to implement. The methodological framework proposed in this study acts as a proof-of-concept for examining concerns around distributive justice using quantitative energy modelling tools and drawing policy relevant insights for energy planning in developing countries. Additionally, by focusing on the spatial aspects of energy access and the issue of fairness, the study also contributes to the growing conceptualizations of energy justice.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
ELSEVIER SCI LTD , 2020. Vol. 264, article id UNSP 114749
Keywords [en]
Energy systems modelling, Energy access, Energy justice, Tanzania, OnSSET, GIS
National Category
Energy Systems
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-271755DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114749ISI: 000519517700058Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85080992373OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-271755DiVA, id: diva2:1422547
Note

QC 20200408

Available from: 2020-04-08 Created: 2020-04-08 Last updated: 2020-04-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Korkovelos, AlexandrosKhavari, BabakSahlberg, Andreas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Korkovelos, AlexandrosKhavari, BabakSahlberg, Andreas
By organisation
Energy Systems Analysis
In the same journal
Applied Energy
Energy Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 50 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf