kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Learning Action-Perception Cycles in Robotics A Question of Representations and Embodiment
Max Planck Inst Intelligent Syst, Autonomous Mot Dept, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany..
KTH, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), Intelligent systems, Robotics, Perception and Learning, RPL. KTH, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), Centres, Centre for Autonomous Systems, CAS.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2965-2953
2015 (English)In: PRAGMATIC TURN: TOWARD ACTION-ORIENTED VIEWS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE / [ed] Engel, AK Friston, KJ Kragic, D, MIT PRESS , 2015, p. 309-320Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Since the 1950s, robotics research has sought to build a general-purpose agent capable of autonomous, open-ended interaction with realistic, unconstrained environments. Cognition is perceived to be at the core of this process, yet understan#ding has been challenged because cognition is referred to differently within and across research areas, and is not clearly defined. The classic robotics approach is decomposition into functional modules which perform planning, reasoning, and problem solving or provide input to these mechanisms. Although advancements have been made and numerous success stories reported in specific niches, this systems-engineering approach has not succeeded in building such a cognitive agent. The emergence of an action-oriented paradigm oilers a new approach: action and perception are no longer separable into functional modules but must be considered in a complete loop. This chapter reviews work on different mechanisms for action-perception learning and discusses the role of embodiment in the design of the underlying representations and learning. It discusses the evaluation of agents and suggests the development of a new embodied Turing lest. Appropriate scenarios need to be devised in addition to current competitions, so that abilities can be tested over long time periods.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MIT PRESS , 2015. p. 309-320
Series
Strungmann Forum Reports
National Category
Human Computer Interaction
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-303908ISI: 000560968000018ISBN: 978-0-262-03432-6 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-303908DiVA, id: diva2:1604839
Conference
17th Ernst Strungmann Forum on Pragmatic Turn - Toward Action-Oriented Views in Cognitive Science, OCT 26-31, 2014, Frankfurt am Main, GERMANY
Note

QC 20211021

Available from: 2021-10-21 Created: 2021-10-21 Last updated: 2022-06-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records

Kragic, Danica

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kragic, Danica
By organisation
Robotics, Perception and Learning, RPLCentre for Autonomous Systems, CAS
Human Computer Interaction

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 55 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf