kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A framework based on statistical analysis and stakeholders' preferences to inform weighting in composite indicators
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Sustainable development, Environmental science and Engineering.
Singapore ETH Ctr SEC, Swiss Fed Inst Technol ETH Zurich, Future Resilient Syst FRS, CREATE Tower 06-01,1 Create Way, Singapore 138602, Singapore.;Poznan Univ Tech, Inst Comp Sci, Piotrowo 2, PL-60965 Poznan, Poland.;Paul Scherrer Inst, Lab Energy Syst Anal, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland..
Paul Scherrer Inst, Lab Energy Syst Anal, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland..
European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Via E Fermi 2749, I-21027 Ispra, Italy..
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Environmental Modelling & Software, ISSN 1364-8152, E-ISSN 1873-6726, Vol. 145, article id 105208Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Composite Indicators (CIs, a.k.a. indices) are increasingly used as they can simplify interpretation of results by condensing the information of a plurality of underlying indicators in a single measure. This paper demonstrates that the strength of the correlations between the indicators is directly linked with their capacity to transfer information to the CI. A measure of information transfer from each indicator is proposed along with two weightoptimization methods, which allow the weights to be adjusted to achieve either a targeted or maximized information transfer. The tools presented in this paper are applied to a case study for resilience assessment of energy systems, demonstrating how they can support the tailored development of CIs. These findings enable analysts bridging the statistical properties of the index with the weighting preferences from the stakeholders. They can thus choose a weighting scheme and possibly modify the index while achieving a more consistent (by correlation) index.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV , 2021. Vol. 145, article id 105208
Keywords [en]
Composite indicators, Index, Weights, Optimization, Resilience, Security of electricity supply, Sensitivity analysis
National Category
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-303762DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105208ISI: 000703667700003Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85115789554OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-303762DiVA, id: diva2:1605972
Note

QC 20211026

Available from: 2021-10-26 Created: 2021-10-26 Last updated: 2022-06-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Lindén, David

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lindén, David
By organisation
Sustainable development, Environmental science and Engineering
In the same journal
Environmental Modelling & Software
Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 28 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf