kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A Standards Organization for Open and FAIR Neuroscience: the International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Neuroinformatics, ISSN 1539-2791, E-ISSN 1559-0089Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

There is great need for coordination around standards and best practices in neuroscience to support efforts to make neuroscience a data-centric discipline. Major brain initiatives launched around the world are poised to generate huge stores of neuroscience data. At the same time, neuroscience, like many domains in biomedicine, is confronting the issues of transparency, rigor, and reproducibility. Widely used, validated standards and best practices are key to addressing the challenges in both big and small data science, as they are essential for integrating diverse data and for developing a robust, effective, and sustainable infrastructure to support open and reproducible neuroscience. However, developing community standards and gaining their adoption is difficult. The current landscape is characterized both by a lack of robust, validated standards and a plethora of overlapping, underdeveloped, untested and underutilized standards and best practices. The International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility (INCF), an independent organization dedicated to promoting data sharing through the coordination of infrastructure and standards, has recently implemented a formal procedure for evaluating and endorsing community standards and best practices in support of the FAIR principles. By formally serving as a standards organization dedicated to open and FAIR neuroscience, INCF helps evaluate, promulgate, and coordinate standards and best practices across neuroscience. Here, we provide an overview of the process and discuss how neuroscience can benefit from having a dedicated standards body.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature , 2021.
Keywords [en]
FAIR principles, INCF, INCF endorsement process, Neuroinformatics, Neuroscience, Standards and best practices, Standards organization
National Category
Information Systems Bioinformatics (Computational Biology) Bioinformatics and Computational Biology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-304652DOI: 10.1007/s12021-020-09509-0ISI: 000612295900002PubMedID: 33506383Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85099813967OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-304652DiVA, id: diva2:1611505
Note

Correction in: Neuroinformatics (2021). DOI: 10.1007/s12021-020-09509-0, WOS: 000639794100001, QC 20220928

Available from: 2021-11-15 Created: 2021-11-15 Last updated: 2025-02-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Hellgren Kotaleski, Jeanette

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hellgren Kotaleski, Jeanette
By organisation
Computational Science and Technology (CST)
In the same journal
Neuroinformatics
Information SystemsBioinformatics (Computational Biology)Bioinformatics and Computational Biology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 273 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf