kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Toward a sustainable educational engineer archetype through Industry 4.0
Univ Pisa, Dept Civil & Ind Engn, I-56122 Pisa, Italy..
Loughborough Univ, Intelligent Automat Ctr, Wolfson Sch Mech Elect & Mfg Engn, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England..
Univ Ljubljana, Fac Mech Engn, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia..
Politecn Torino, Dept Management & Prod Engn, I-10129 Turin, Italy..
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Computers in industry (Print), ISSN 0166-3615, E-ISSN 1872-6194, Vol. 134, article id 103543Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In the last decade, a shift toward Sustainable Development (SD) in engineering has started in the educational and occupational framework. Therefore, the need to rethink the professional figures of an engineer has become a necessity. Unfortunately, neither a formal methodology to define a standard engineer archetype nor procedural methods to evaluate such archetypes' contribution to SD are investigated. This paper bridges the first gap by proposing a general methodology to define specific engineer archetypes as technical competences from educational -Semi Structured Intended Learning Outcomes (SS-ILOs) -and occupational -European Skills, Competences, Qualifications and Occupations (ESCO) -frameworks. The second gap is addressed by a procedural method based on indirect mapping of the identified archetypes onto United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN-SDGs). Since Industry 4.0 (I4.0) is the working environment of future engineers and has a promising potential to achive SDGs, I4.0 technologies influences on SDGs are used as a bridge to evaluate sustainability of the defined enigineer archetypes. Finally, we provide the application of our proposed methodology to the Industrial engineering case study. The results show that significant limitations toward sustainability remain open challenges. However, the intrinsic nature of the industrial engineer is confined to some specific goals, and a characteristic signature on sustainability emerged.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV , 2021. Vol. 134, article id 103543
Keywords [en]
Industry 4, 0, Engineer archetype, Sustainable development goals, Educational & professional engineer, Industrial engineering
National Category
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-304754DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2021.103543ISI: 000710498500001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85121394547OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-304754DiVA, id: diva2:1613203
Note

QC 20211122

Available from: 2021-11-22 Created: 2021-11-22 Last updated: 2022-06-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Maffei, AntonioBoffa, Eleonora

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Maffei, AntonioBoffa, Eleonora
By organisation
Production Engineering
In the same journal
Computers in industry (Print)
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 78 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf