kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A Model for Teaching Systems Thinking: A Tool for Analysing Technology Teachers’ Conceptualising of Systems Thinking, and How it is Described in Technology Textbooks for Compulsory School
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Learning, Learning in Stem.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4918-1298
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Learning, Learning in Stem.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7778-2552
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Learning, Learning in Stem.
2021 (English)In: Techneserien : forskning i slöjdpedagik och slöjdvetenskap. B, ISSN 1238-951X, Vol. 28, no 2, p. 241-251Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This study concerns how technology teachers conceptualize systems thinking and how textbook descriptions of systems can be related to systems thinking. The analysis is conducted using the ‘Freiburg heuristic model of systems thinking’, which uses four dimensions of systems thinking: (1) declarative and conceptual knowledge, (2) modelling systems, (3) solving problems using system models, and (4) evaluation of system models. It concerns both propositional knowledge and problem-solving skills, which makes it suitable for technology education purposes. Four Swedish technology textbooks, intended for years 7–9 in compulsory school (pupils aged 13–16 years), were analysed. The declarative dimension was present in varying degrees through use of terms and concepts related to systems (component, input, output, etc.). System modelling processes, model use, and model evaluation are absent. An interview with three technology teachers working in compulsory school (pupils aged 7–16 years) rendered similar results. When prompted to describe systems thinking and how it is taught, they talked mainly in conceptual terms (e.g., systems as sets of interacting components). To some extent they discussed pupils’ modelling activities, but not how models could be used for problem solving, explanation, or prediction. The teachers also put forward historical perspectives on infrastructure as part of systems thinking. The study suggests that systems thinking in compulsory school could be developed further. The use of system models to understand for example complex environmental problems related to technology use, or perform life cycle analyses is not emphasized, neither by the teachers nor in the textbooks.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2021. Vol. 28, no 2, p. 241-251
Keywords [en]
systems thinking, technology teaching, technological systems, compulsory school, system modelling
National Category
Didactics
Research subject
Technology and Learning
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-305459OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-305459DiVA, id: diva2:1615084
Note

QC 20211201

Available from: 2021-11-29 Created: 2021-11-29 Last updated: 2022-06-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

https://journals.oslomet.no/index.php/techneA/article/view/4320

Authority records

Engström, SusanneNorström, PerSöderberg, Henni

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Engström, SusanneNorström, PerSöderberg, Henni
By organisation
Learning in Stem
In the same journal
Techneserien : forskning i slöjdpedagik och slöjdvetenskap. B
Didactics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 443 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf