kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Modularity in Design of Dynamical Network Systems: Retrofit Control Approach
Tokyo Inst Technol, Grad Sch Engn, Meguro 1528550, Japan..
KTH, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), Intelligent systems, Decision and Control Systems (Automatic Control).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8598-0348
Keio Univ, Fac Sci & Technol, Yokohama, Kanagawa 1088345, Japan..
Gunma Univ, Sch Sci & Technol, Gunma 3718510, Japan..
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, ISSN 0018-9286, E-ISSN 1558-2523, Vol. 66, no 11, p. 5205-5220Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In this article, we develop a modular design method of decentralized controllers for linear dynamical network systems, where multiple subcontroller designers aim at individually regulating their local control performance with accessibility only to their respective subsystem models. First, we derive a constrained version of the Youla parameterization that characterizes all retrofit controllers for a single subcontroller, defined as an add-on-type subcontroller that manages a subsystem. The resultant feedback system is kept robustly stable for any variation in the neighboring subsystems, other than the subsystem of interest, provided that the original system is stable prior to implementing the retrofit control. Subsequently, we find out a unique internal structure of the retrofit controllers, assuming that the interaction input signal from the neighboring subsystems is measurable. Furthermore, we show that the simultaneous implementation of multiple retrofit controllers, designed by individual subcontroller designers, can improve the upper bound of the overall control performance. Finally, the practical significance of the method is demonstrated via an illustrative example of frequency regulation using the IEEE 68-bus power system model.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) , 2021. Vol. 66, no 11, p. 5205-5220
Keywords [en]
Power system stability, Generators, Design methodology, Power system dynamics, Frequency control, Stability analysis, Standards, Modularity in design, power system stabilizer (PSS), retrofit control, Youla parameterization
National Category
Control Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-305623DOI: 10.1109/TAC.2020.3035631ISI: 000711740700014Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85095477602OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-305623DiVA, id: diva2:1617146
Note

QC 20211206

Available from: 2021-12-06 Created: 2021-12-06 Last updated: 2022-06-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Sasahara, Hampei

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sasahara, Hampei
By organisation
Decision and Control Systems (Automatic Control)
In the same journal
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
Control Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 11 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf