kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Deep neural networks with promising diagnostic accuracy for the classification of atypical femoral fractures
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health (CBH), Biomedical Engineering and Health Systems.
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Acta Orthopaedica, ISSN 1745-3674, E-ISSN 1745-3682, Vol. 92, no 4, p. 394-400Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background and purpose — A correct diagnosis is essential for the appropriate treatment of patients with atypical femoral fractures (AFFs). The diagnostic accuracy of radiographs with standard radiology reports is very poor. We derived a diagnostic algorithm that uses deep neural networks to enable clinicians to discriminate AFFs from normal femur fractures (NFFs) on conventional radiographs. Patients and methods — We entered 433 radiographs from 149 patients with complete AFF and 549 radiographs from 224 patients with NFF into a convolutional neural network (CNN) that acts as a core classifier in an automated pathway and a manual intervention pathway (manual improvement of image orientation). We tested several deep neural network structures (i.e., VGG19, InceptionV3, and ResNet) to identify the network with the highest diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing AFF from NFF. We applied a transfer learning technique and used 5-fold cross-validation and class activation mapping to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy. Results — In the automated pathway, ResNet50 had the highest diagnostic accuracy, with a mean of 91% (SD 1.3), as compared with 83% (SD 1.6) for VGG19, and 89% (SD 2.5) for InceptionV3. The corresponding accuracy levels for the intervention pathway were 94% (SD 2.0), 92% (2.7), and 93% (3.7), respectively. With regards to sensitivity and specificity, ResNet outperformed the other networks with a mean AUC (area under the curve) value of 0.94 (SD 0.01) and surpassed the accuracy of clinical diagnostics. Interpretation — Artificial intelligence systems show excellent diagnostic accuracies for the rare fracture type of AFF in an experimental setting.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Medical Journals Sweden AB , 2021. Vol. 92, no 4, p. 394-400
Keywords [en]
Article, atypical femoral fracture, automation, bone radiography, convolutional neural network, cross validation, deep neural network, diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic test accuracy study, disease classification, femur fracture, human, major clinical study, sensitivity and specificity, transfer of learning, aged, artificial intelligence, classification, diagnostic imaging, female, male, middle aged, radiography, Femoral Fractures, Humans, Neural Networks, Computer
National Category
Orthopaedics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-305851DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1891512ISI: 000621654100001PubMedID: 33627045Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85101559442OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-305851DiVA, id: diva2:1621846
Note

QC 20220614

Available from: 2021-12-20 Created: 2021-12-20 Last updated: 2022-06-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Chen, Yupei

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Chen, Yupei
By organisation
Biomedical Engineering and Health Systems
In the same journal
Acta Orthopaedica
Orthopaedics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 17 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf