kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Exceptionalism and Evasion: How Scholars Reason About Air Travel
KTH, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), Human Centered Technology, Media Technology and Interaction Design, MID.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7662-9687
Södertörn.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3313-4403
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Philosophy and History, History of Science, Technology and Environment.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3221-5818
2022 (English)In: Academic Flying and the Means of Communication / [ed] Kristian Bjørkdahl & Adrian Santiago Franco Duharte, Palgrave Macmillan, 2022, p. 159-183Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Understanding how scholars reason about their own flying habits is important when dealing with the problems of large emissions from academic air travel. This study is based on a travel habits survey with scholars at KTH Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm. KTH has relatively high emissions from air travel, but at the same time, it has a high profile in matters of sustainability and a lot of research related to this theme. One can therefore assume a high degree of knowledge about the climate crisis and the climate impact of various actions. It is also plausible that KTH scholars meet special expectations to be role models and that practices in conflict with their teaching can have consequences for the public confidence in the university. In this study, we look at how scholars reason about how emissions from their flying could be reduced. Their responses display a spectrum of varying attitudes, from climate scepticism to a commitment to radical transformation, with the majority in between, either suggesting different types of concrete changes or invoking arguments to justify the status quo. The proposed interventions, several of which are ingenious and wise, can guide university managements to strategies that have support from employees. The more reluctant arguments point to cultural and discursive habits that must be understood and met in an empathetic way. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Palgrave Macmillan, 2022. p. 159-183
Keywords [en]
Academic flying, Sustainability, Carbon emissions, Reasoning, Topoi
National Category
Other Humanities not elsewhere specified
Research subject
History of Science, Technology and Environment
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-306968DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-4911-0_7OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-306968DiVA, id: diva2:1625428
Projects
FLIGHT3250SFLAB
Note

Part of book: ISBN 978-981-16-4913-4, QC 20221003

Available from: 2022-01-07 Created: 2022-01-07 Last updated: 2022-10-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textChapter

Authority records

Eriksson, ElinaWormbs, Nina

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eriksson, ElinaWolrath Söderberg, MariaWormbs, Nina
By organisation
Media Technology and Interaction Design, MIDHistory of Science, Technology and Environment
Other Humanities not elsewhere specified

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 569 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf