kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparing Backscatter Communication and Energy Harvesting in Massive IoT Networks
KTH, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), Computer Science, Network and Systems Engineering. Ericsson AB, S-16483 Kista, Sweden..ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1934-9208
KTH, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), Computer Science, Network and Systems Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5091-6285
KTH, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), Computer Science, Network and Systems Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9810-3478
2022 (English)In: IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, ISSN 1536-1276, E-ISSN 1558-2248, Vol. 21, no 1, p. 429-443Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Backscatter communication (BC) and radio-frequency energy harvesting (RF-EH) are two promising technologies for extending the battery lifetime of wireless devices. Although there have been some qualitative comparisons between these two technologies, quantitative comparisons are still lacking, especially for massive IoT networks. In this paper, we address this gap in the research literature, and perform a quantitative comparison between BC and RF-EH in massive IoT networks with multiple primary users and multiple low-power devices acting as secondary users. An essential feature of our model is that it includes the interferences caused by the secondary users to the primary users, and we show that these interferences significantly impact the system performance of massive IoT networks. For the RF-EH model, the power requirements of digital-to-analog and signal amplification are taken into account. We pose and solve a power minimization problem for BC, and we show analytically when BC is better than RF-EH. The results of the numerical simulations illustrate the significant benefits of using BC in terms of saving power and supporting massive IoT, compared to using RF-EH. The results also show that the backscatter coefficients of the BC devices must be individually tunable, in order to guarantee good performance of BC.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) , 2022. Vol. 21, no 1, p. 429-443
Keywords [en]
Backscatter, Radio transmitters, Wireless communication, Base stations, Performance evaluation, Radio frequency, Interference, Backscatter communication, energy harvesting, internet of Things, power optimization
National Category
Communication Systems
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-307265DOI: 10.1109/TWC.2021.3096800ISI: 000740005900033Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85111012818OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-307265DiVA, id: diva2:1630400
Note

QC 20220120

Available from: 2022-01-20 Created: 2022-01-20 Last updated: 2022-06-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Du, RongTimoudas, Thomas OhlsonFischione, Carlo

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Du, RongTimoudas, Thomas OhlsonFischione, Carlo
By organisation
Network and Systems Engineering
In the same journal
IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications
Communication Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 107 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf