kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Back and forth between openness and focusing: handling complexity in land use and transport coordination
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Urban Planning and Environment, Urban and Regional Studies. WSP Sverige AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Urban Planning and Environment, Urban and Regional Studies.
2022 (English)In: European Planning Studies, ISSN 0965-4313, E-ISSN 1469-5944, Vol. 30, no 12, p. 2394-2411Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This paper examines how complexity at the land use and transport (LUT) interface can be handled in practice, empirically focusing on a planning activity in Swedish national transport planning, so called Strategic Choice of Measures (SCM). Viewing LUT coordination as a question of handling complexity along two dimensions, one relating to the substantial issues of the problem, the other to the actors involved, the relation between open and focused approaches to delimitation of scope and the participation of actors are analysed in three SCM case studies. The study highlights two necessary but potentially contradicting conditions for LUT coordination. On the one hand, the complexity of problems at the LUT interface requires a comprehensive perspective and a diverse set of participants to enable a sufficiently wide framing of these problems. On the other hand, strategically rational actors will demand an approach which maintains a high degree of relevance for their particular interests, and the process therefore requires a focus on selected issues. The paper concludes that handling complexity at the LUT interface requires an acknowledgement of the need for both approaches, arguing that LUT coordination is benefitted by seeing openness and focusing as complementary rather than contradictory approaches in planning situations. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Informa UK Limited , 2022. Vol. 30, no 12, p. 2394-2411
Keywords [en]
complexity, comprehensiveness, diversity, interdependence, Land use and transport coordination, selectivity
National Category
Transport Systems and Logistics Other Social Sciences not elsewhere specified Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-309654DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2021.1926437ISI: 000649586000001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85106297536OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-309654DiVA, id: diva2:1643176
Note

QC 20250507

Available from: 2022-03-09 Created: 2022-03-09 Last updated: 2025-05-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Tornberg, PatrikOdhage, John

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Tornberg, PatrikOdhage, John
By organisation
Urban and Regional Studies
In the same journal
European Planning Studies
Transport Systems and LogisticsOther Social Sciences not elsewhere specifiedBusiness Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 40 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf