kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Get out of the BAG! Silos in AI Ethics Education: Unsupervised Topic Modeling Analysis of Global AI Curricula
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, E-ISSN 1076-9757, Vol. 73, p. 933-965Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The domain of Artificial Intelligence (AI) ethics is not new, with discussions going back at least 40 years. Teaching the principles and requirements of ethical AI to students is considered an essential part of this domain, with an increasing number of technical AI courses taught at several higher-education institutions around the globe including content related to ethics. By using Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), a generative probabilistic topic model, this study uncovers topics in teaching ethics in AI courses and their trends related to where the courses are taught, by whom, and at what level of cognitive complexity and specificity according to Bloom’s taxonomy. In this exploratory study based on unsupervised machine learning, we analyzed a total of 166 courses: 116 from North American universities, 11 from Asia, 36 from Europe, and 10 from other regions. Based on this analysis, we were able to synthesize a model of teaching approaches, which we call BAG (Build, Assess, and Govern), that combines specific cognitive levels, course content topics, and disciplines affiliated with the department(s) in charge of the course. We critically assess the implications of this teaching paradigm and provide suggestions about how to move away from these practices. We challenge teaching practitioners and program coordinators to reflect on their usual procedures so that they may expand their methodology beyond the confines of stereotypical thought and traditional biases regarding what disciplines should teach and how.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
AI Access Foundation , 2022. Vol. 73, p. 933-965
National Category
Pedagogy Educational Sciences Ethics Computer Sciences
Research subject
Computer Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-310442DOI: 10.1613/jair.1.13550ISI: 000777876900001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85129577533OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-310442DiVA, id: diva2:1648563
Note

QC 20220401

Available from: 2022-03-31 Created: 2022-03-31 Last updated: 2023-09-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopushttps://www.jair.org/index.php/jair/article/view/13550

Authority records

Zea, EliasVinuesa, Ricardo

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Zea, EliasVinuesa, Ricardo
By organisation
Engineering MechanicsLinné Flow Center, FLOW
PedagogyEducational SciencesEthicsComputer Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 266 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf