kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A systematic review into expert knowledge elicitation methods for emerging food and feed risk identification
Newcastle Univ, Sch Nat & Environm Sci, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, England..
Newcastle Univ, Sch Nat & Environm Sci, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, England..
Newcastle Univ, Sch Nat & Environm Sci, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, England..
Newcastle Univ, Sch Nat & Environm Sci, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, England..
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Food Control, ISSN 0956-7135, E-ISSN 1873-7129, Vol. 136, p. 108848-, article id 108848Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

An emerging risk results "... from a newly identified hazard to which a significant exposure may occur, or from an unexpected new or increased significant exposure and/or susceptibility to a known hazard". In the field of emerging food and feed risks, expert knowledge elicitation methodologies represent important tools for identifying and addressing data gaps associated with emerging risk identification, particularly under conditions of risk uncertainty and/or ambiguity. A systematic review was conducted to identify expert knowledge elicitation methods which have been used in the context of emerging food and feed risks. The primary research questions were which existing expert knowledge elicitation methodologies have been used to study emerging food and feed risks? and what contexts or situations have been studied using expert knowledge elicitation methodologies in relation to emerging food and feed-related risks? Three databases were searched: Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Searches covered all studies published from 1998 onwards. A total of 59 studies were included in the review following the application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Given the heterogeneity of the included studies, a thematic analysis was applied to assess these papers in relation to the research questions. There was no one expert knowledge elicitation method consistently adopted for the identification of a specific type of emerging food and feed risk. Method triangulation was observed in 23 studies and was reported to improve the validity of results in 15 of these. Most published research considered emerging risks associated with societal controversy ("ambiguous risks"). Although the use of methodological triangulation appears to be helpful in relation to understanding emerging food and feed risks, future research into the development of a harmonised framework will enable the identification, processing, and evaluation of emerging food risks in a systemic way which can facilitate comparative analysis and harmonise mitigation strategies to address emerging risks and their drivers.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV , 2022. Vol. 136, p. 108848-, article id 108848
Keywords [en]
Expert knowledge elicitation, Food safety, Emerging risk identification, Systematic review
National Category
Pedagogy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-313091DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.108848ISI: 000791124600001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85125192596OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-313091DiVA, id: diva2:1662279
Projects
SFLAB
Note

QC 20220824

Available from: 2022-05-31 Created: 2022-05-31 Last updated: 2022-08-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Comber, Rob

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Comber, Rob
By organisation
Media Technology and Interaction Design, MID
In the same journal
Food Control
Pedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 89 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf