kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Interactions between glucosides of the tip of the S1 subunit of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and dry and wet surfaces of CuO and Cu-A model for the surfaces of coinage metals
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Materials Science and Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0086-5536
2022 (English)In: Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, ISSN 0927-7765, E-ISSN 1873-4367, Vol. 214, p. 112465-, article id 112465Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Despite their importance there is little knowledge at the atomic scale on the interactions between fragments of SARS-CoV-2 and inorganic materials. Such knowledge is important to understand the survival of the virus at surfaces and for the development of antiviral materials. Here is reported a study of the interactions between glucoside monomers of the tip of the S1 subunit of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein with dry and wet surfaces of CuO and Cu, performed with dispersion corrected density functional theory & mdash;DFT. The three glucoside monomers that constitute the tip of S1: 6VSB, 6VXX and 6X6P, were adsorbed onto dry and wet CuO(111) and Cu(110) with different orientations and surface alignments.& nbsp;There are large differences & mdash;of up to 1.3 eV & mdash;in binding energies between these monomers and the surfaces. These differences depend on: the type of surface; if the surface is wet or dry; if the glucosidic O-atom points towards or away from the surfaces; and to a smaller extent on the surface alignment of the monomers. All monomers bind strongly to the surfaces via molecular adsorption that does not involve bond breaking in the monomers at this stage. 6VSB has the larger adsorption energies & mdash;that reach 2.2 eV & mdash;due to its larger dipole moment. Both materials bind the monomers more strongly when their surfaces are dry. At Cu(110) the bonds are on average 1 eV stronger when the surface is dry when compared to wet. The difference between dry and wet CuO(111) is smaller, in the order of 0.2 eV. Overall, it is here shown that the stability of the monomers of the tip of the spike protein of the virus is very different at different surfaces. For a given surface the larger binding energies in dry conditions could explain the differences in the surface stability of the spike protein depending on the presence of moisture.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV , 2022. Vol. 214, p. 112465-, article id 112465
Keywords [en]
Quantum mechanical modeling, SARS-CoV-2, Spike protein, Interactions with inorganic surfaces, DFT
National Category
Probability Theory and Statistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-313336DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.112465ISI: 000796628400002PubMedID: 35334309Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85126833689OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-313336DiVA, id: diva2:1663428
Note

QC 20220602

Available from: 2022-06-02 Created: 2022-06-02 Last updated: 2022-06-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Lousada, Claudio M.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lousada, Claudio M.
By organisation
Materials Science and Engineering
In the same journal
Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
Probability Theory and Statistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 45 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf