kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Application-Oriented Input Design With Low Coherence Constraint
KTH, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), Intelligent systems, Decision and Control Systems (Automatic Control).ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1520-4041
KTH, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), Intelligent systems, Decision and Control Systems (Automatic Control).ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0355-2663
KTH, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), Intelligent systems, Decision and Control Systems (Automatic Control).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9368-3079
2023 (English)In: IEEE Control Systems Letters, E-ISSN 2475-1456, Vol. 7, p. 193-198Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In optimal input design input sequences are typically generated without paying attention to the correlations between the regressors of the model to be estimated. In fact, in many cases high correlations are beneficial. This is in contrast to the requirements in sparse estimation. Mutual coherence is the maximum of these correlations, and in case the parameter vector is known to be sparse, we need a low mutual coherence in order to estimate it accurately. This contribution proposes adding a constraint on the mutual coherence to the optimal input design problem to improve the accuracy of estimated sparse models. The proposed method can be combined with any sparse estimation algorithm to estimate the parameters of a model. However, we focus in particular on the bound on the mutual coherence required for Orthogonal Matching Pursuit (OMP), a well-known algorithm in sparse estimation. Furthermore, we analyze the effect of the proposed method on the required input power. Finally, we evaluate, in a numerical study, the performance of the proposed method compared to state-of-the-art algorithms for input design.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) , 2023. Vol. 7, p. 193-198
Keywords [en]
Coherence, Matching pursuit algorithms, Degradation, Optimization, Ellipsoids, Mathematical models, Costs, System identification, input design, sparse estimation, mutual coherence
National Category
Probability Theory and Statistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-315885DOI: 10.1109/LCSYS.2022.3187319ISI: 000824789000003Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85133775635OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-315885DiVA, id: diva2:1684828
Note

QC 20220728

Available from: 2022-07-28 Created: 2022-07-28 Last updated: 2023-08-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Parsa, JavadRojas, Cristian R.Hjalmarsson, Håkan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Parsa, JavadRojas, Cristian R.Hjalmarsson, Håkan
By organisation
Decision and Control Systems (Automatic Control)
In the same journal
IEEE Control Systems Letters
Probability Theory and Statistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 196 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf