kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
SpineOpt: A flexible open-source energy system modelling framework
Katholieke Univ Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 300,Box 2421, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium..
KTH, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), Electrical Engineering, Electric Power and Energy Systems.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3822-8014
VTT Tech Res Ctr Finland Ltd, Box 1000, FI-02044 Espoo, Finland..
Energy Reform Ltd, 22 Avoca Dr, Bray Co, Wicklow, Ireland..
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Energy Strategy Reviews, ISSN 2211-467X, E-ISSN 2211-4688, Vol. 43, article id 100902Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The transition towards more sustainable energy systems poses new requirements on energy system models. New challenges include representing more uncertainties, including short-term detail in long-term planning models, allowing for more integration across energy sectors, and dealing with increased model complexities. SpineOpt is a flexible, open-source, energy system modelling framework for performing operational and planning studies, consisting of a wide spectrum of novel tools and functionalities. The most salient features of SpineOpt include a generic data structure, flexible temporal and spatial structures, a comprehensive representation of uncertainties, and model decomposition capabilities to reduce the computational complexity. These enable the implementation of highly diverse case studies. SpineOpt's features are presented through several publicly -available applications. An illustrative case study presents the impact of different temporal resolutions and stochastic structures in a co-optimised electricity and gas network. Using a lower temporal resolution in different parts of the model leads to a lower computational time (44%-98% reductions), while the total system cost varies only slightly (-1.22-1.39%). This implies that modellers experiencing computational issues should choose a high level of temporal accuracy only when needed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV , 2022. Vol. 43, article id 100902
Keywords [en]
Open source tool, Energy system modelling, Energy system analysis, Integrated energy systems, Investment planning, Sector coupling
National Category
Energy Systems
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-316323DOI: 10.1016/j.esr.2022.100902ISI: 000834195800002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85134876160OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-316323DiVA, id: diva2:1687233
Note

QC 20220815

Available from: 2022-08-15 Created: 2022-08-15 Last updated: 2022-08-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Kouveliotis Lysikatos, IasonasMarin, Manuel

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kouveliotis Lysikatos, IasonasMarin, Manuel
By organisation
Electric Power and Energy Systems
In the same journal
Energy Strategy Reviews
Energy Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 188 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf