kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Modelling of suspended sediment load by Bayesian optimized machine learning methods with seasonal adjustment
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Civil and Architectural Engineering, Concrete Structures.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5239-6559
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Sustainable development, Environmental science and Engineering, Resources, Energy and Infrastructure. Vattenfall AB, R&D Hydraul Lab, Alvkarleby, Sweden..ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4242-3824
2022 (English)In: Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, ISSN 1994-2060, E-ISSN 1997-003X, Vol. 16, no 1, p. 1883-1901Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Suspended sediment load (SSL) is essential to river and dam engineering. Due to the complexity and stochastic nature of sedimentation, SSL prediction is a challenging task and conventional methods often fail to generate accurate results. Aiming to provide an improved estimation, this paper contributes to a new forecasting framework by integrating the seasonal adjustment (SA) and Bayesian optimization (BOP) into a machine learning (ML) model (denoted as BMS). The SA is used for de-seasonalisation and trend extraction; the BOP is to optimize the ML architecture. The BMS is evaluated using the daily SSL records from the Yangtze River. Its performance is appraised by statistical criteria of Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), correlation coefficient (CC), root mean squared error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE). With the de-noising and hyper-parameter tuning modules, the BMS effectively heightens the accuracy of the standard ML models. The most significant improvement occurs in the Boosting model, with its augments in NSE and CC by 4.3% and 1.6%, and reductions in RMSE and MAE by 24.9% and 24.2%. The BMS gains by comparison even under flood conditions, where it remarkably reduces the errors of the constituent models by up to 47.9% for RMSE and 48.3% for MAE.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Informa UK Limited , 2022. Vol. 16, no 1, p. 1883-1901
Keywords [en]
Suspended sediment load, machine learning, seasonal adjustment, Bayesian optimisation
National Category
Probability Theory and Statistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-319434DOI: 10.1080/19942060.2022.2121944ISI: 000855734300001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85138346546OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-319434DiVA, id: diva2:1699831
Note

QC 20220929

Available from: 2022-09-29 Created: 2022-09-29 Last updated: 2023-05-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Li, ShichengYang, James

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Li, ShichengYang, James
By organisation
Concrete StructuresResources, Energy and Infrastructure
In the same journal
Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics
Probability Theory and Statistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 37 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf