kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Automating Teacher Work?: A History of the Politics of Automation and Artificial Intelligence in Education
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Philosophy and History, History of Science, Technology and Environment.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0410-8241
2022 (English)In: Postdigital Science and Education, ISSN 2524-485XArticle in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The debate on automation in education is also a debate on teachers’ work. Throughout history, promises of labor-saving and efficient automation technologies have been repeatedly promoted, while research at the same time has rather argued that automations will always depend on extensive human labor. In this study, we historicize how automation in education has been related to teachers’ work and with what implications. Based on Sweden’s long history of educational technology, we have drawn on digital and archival materials published from 1957 to the present. By contrasting the policy elements on automation and artificial intelligence (AI) across the past several decades, we show how debates and technologies are dynamically established and naturalized over time, which also risk silencing the critical debates on what the politics of automation and AI means for teachers’ work and for public education. We conclude not only that the automation debate aligns with familiar ‘techno-solutionist’ educational technology histories, including forms of resistance on the technological uptake in education and society, but also that the scale and impact of automation are shifting with the technologies for automation and global platform infrastructures integrated into education. Consequently, one of the main questions is how the critical debate on automating teacher work and education is made possible even under such circumstances. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature , 2022.
National Category
Pedagogy History of Technology Educational Sciences
Research subject
History of Science, Technology and Environment
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-320979DOI: 10.1007/s42438-022-00344-xScopus ID: 2-s2.0-85140833945OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-320979DiVA, id: diva2:1708379
Funder
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2019-01317_ForteUniversity of GothenburgWallenberg Foundations
Note

QC 20221109

Available from: 2022-11-03 Created: 2022-11-03 Last updated: 2022-11-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Rahm, Lina

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rensfeldt, Annika BergvikenRahm, Lina
By organisation
History of Science, Technology and Environment
PedagogyHistory of TechnologyEducational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 301 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf