kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Internal Feedback in Biological Control: Diversity, Delays, and Standard Theory
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences (SCI), Mathematics (Dept.), Mathematics (Div.).
CALTECH, Comp & Math Sci, Pasadena, CA USA..
CALTECH, Computat & Neural Syst, Pasadena, CA USA..
CALTECH, Comp & Math Sci, Pasadena, CA USA..
2022 (English)In: 2022 American Control Conference (ACC), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2022, p. 462-467Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Neural architectures in organisms support efficient and robust control that is beyond the capability of engineered architectures. Unraveling the function of such architectures is challenging; their components are highly diverse and heterogeneous in their morphology, physiology, and biochemistry, and often obey severe speed-accuracy tradeoffs; they also contain many cryptic internal feedback pathways (IFPs). We claim that IFPs are crucial architectural features that strategically combine highly diverse components to give rise to optimal performance. We demonstrate this in a case study, and additionally describe how sensing and actuation delays in standard control (state feedback, full control, output feedback) give rise to independent and separable sources of IFPs. Our case study is an LQR problem with two types of sensors, one fast but sparse and one dense but slow. Controllers using only one type of sensor perform poorly, often failing even to stabilize; controllers using both types of sensors perform extremely well, demonstrating a strong diversity-enabled sweet spot (DESS). We demonstrate that IFPs are key in enabling this DESS, and additionally that with IFPs removed, controllers with delayed sensing perform poorly. The existence of strong DESS and IFP in this simple example suggest that these are fundamental architectural features in any complex system with diverse components, such as organisms and cyherphysical systems.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2022. p. 462-467
Series
Proceedings of the American Control Conference, ISSN 0743-1619
National Category
Control Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-321259DOI: 10.23919/ACC53348.2022.9867794ISI: 000865458700062Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85138491875OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-321259DiVA, id: diva2:1710203
Conference
American Control Conference (ACC), JUN 08-10, 2022, Atlanta, GA, USA
Note

QC 20221111

Part of proceedings: ISBN 978-1-6654-5196-3

Available from: 2022-11-11 Created: 2022-11-11 Last updated: 2022-11-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Stenberg, Josefin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Stenberg, Josefin
By organisation
Mathematics (Div.)
Control Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 59 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf