kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Results for the comparison between e-scooter trips and their public transport and walking equivalent in the city of Gothenburg
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Centres, Integrated Transport Research Lab, ITRL.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6986-972x
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Centres, Integrated Transport Research Lab, ITRL.ORCID iD: 0009-0003-3138-2515
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Centres, Integrated Transport Research Lab, ITRL.ORCID iD: 0009-0001-7363-8940
2023 (English)Report (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))Alternative title
Project ELKOLL (English)
Abstract [en]

This project examined shared e-scooter trips provided by the operator Voi and used a trip planner to determine the potential alternatives if users had chosen to walk or utilise public transportation (PT) instead.

 

The analysis reveals that Voi trips are typically brief, with 71% lasting less than 10 minutes, usually covering 1-2 kilometres, and mostly occurring within central Gothenburg. The trip planner indicated that walking would be the best alternative for roughly half of the trips, while public transportation would be the main alternative for the other half. 

 

For the trips for which the trip planner suggested walking as the best alternative, 81% of them are less than 1 km long, meaning they could be alternatively covered by walking 15 minutes or less. Nonetheless, 89% of trips are faster with Voi, and 72% of them begin or end within 100 metres of a public transport stop, which strongly implies intermodal behaviour among e-scooter users and the use of e-scooters as a first/last mile solution; however, further research is necessary to support this statement.

 

Regarding the trips for which the trip planner suggested PT with no transfers, half of the users would have had to walk 500 m or more to access and egress PT and 80% of them started or ended within 100 m of a public transport stop, which can suggest users choosing Voi to replace a leg of their trips; or even the complete trip, considering that roughly half of these trips would have been theoretically cheaper with Voi instead of PT. Nonetheless, once again, more research is needed to support these hypotheses.

 

Generally, shared e-scooters hold the potential to complement public transportation services in densely populated urban areas, a notion supported by this study and prior academic and grey research. Even in the absence of parking regulations, users tend to initiate or conclude their trips near public transport stops, which can serve as a valuable guideline for developing parking policy.

 

In conclusion, shared e-scooters represent an important aspect of urban transportation that should not be overlooked. It is crucial to engage both existing and potential e-scooter operators in transportation planning to foster collaboration with municipalities, PT agencies and local communities. This collaborative effort should aim to promote multimodality, integrated ticketing solutions, and user-centric approaches that encourage a shift away from less sustainable transportation modes.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2023. , p. 27
Keywords [en]
Micromobility; E-scooters, E-scooter sharing, E-scooter alternative, Mode substitution, OpenTripPlanner
National Category
Transport Systems and Logistics
Research subject
Transport Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-327895OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-327895DiVA, id: diva2:1761456
Projects
ELKOLL
Note

QC 20230607

Available from: 2023-06-01 Created: 2023-06-01 Last updated: 2023-06-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(4916 kB)167 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 4916 kBChecksum SHA-512
aa7a2f3f49cac20234b173c76e8f48174f87dc36b2b0dea3653b4637e02a66cd486e9afd9026231f1bab7f4abe4a3f7ed3521350fc10e1d0edc7904142e44696
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

https://www.itrl.kth.se/polopoly_fs/1.1252792.1683184672!/ELKOLL%20Report.pdf

Authority records

Almlöf, ErikMicallef, DavidAcosta Carrascal, Henry

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Almlöf, ErikMicallef, DavidAcosta Carrascal, Henry
By organisation
Integrated Transport Research Lab, ITRL
Transport Systems and Logistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 167 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 502 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf