kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Effective shear stiffness of cross-laminated timber: Comparison between numerical and analytical approaches
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Civil and Architectural Engineering, Structural Engineering and Bridges.
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Civil and Architectural Engineering, Structural Engineering and Bridges.
2023 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The increasing importance of sustainability has led to a focus on smart solutions for energy consumption and materials. Cross-laminated timber (CLT) has gained attention as a sustainable alternative in construction, offering high strength, stiffness, and dimensional stability. However, there is a lack of standardized methods for shear design of CLT members loaded in plane, leading to the use of simplified approaches. This study aims to investigate the effective shear stiffness of CLT using Finite Element Analysis (FEA) and validate analytical models. This is done through studying a small volume element “RVE” of a CLT panel. The software Abaqus, in conjunction with a Python script, is employed to analyze the impact of various layer thicknesses on the effective shear stiffness. Two FEA methods, namely the Geometric Method and the Energy Method, are utilized and compared against the hand-calculated models, namely the Analytical Method and the Analytical Method with a correction factor. The findings contribute to understanding the impact that different layer thickness combinations have on the shear stiffness of CLT. The limitations include specific cross-sectional dimensions, linear analyses, and the focus on five-layered CLT panels.The study compares different mesh sizes and element types in FEA and assesses the reliability of analytical and numerical methods. The Energy Method and the Geometric Method generally yield consistent and more conservative results, while the Analytical Methods tend to produce higher stiffness values. However, the Geometric Method exhibits inconsistencies in certain thickness combinations, suggesting modeling challenges. The results provide insights for designing and optimizing CLT panels, but further research and real-life experiments are recommended to validate the methods. Additionally, larger finite element models and improved surface constraints should be explored to improve accuracy.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2023.
Series
TRITA-ABE-MBT ; 23407
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-330357OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-330357DiVA, id: diva2:1777560
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2023-06-29 Created: 2023-06-29

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(11441 kB)458 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 11441 kBChecksum SHA-512
4923827ee6fd929ce13dd7414e73bb23c9c2bb4f03befc83e1f08f5e1bc9b6be37a7c44ed0c8b5b13342b0f8910074fbf653fc8a7dba776da5297887ab0046ad
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Structural Engineering and Bridges
Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 458 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 554 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf