kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Spatial multicriteria framework for sustainable wind-farm planning – accounting for conflicts
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Sustainable development, Environmental science and Engineering. (Environmental Management and Assessment)
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Sustainable development, Environmental science and Engineering. (Environmental Management and Assessment)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1640-8946
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Sustainable development, Environmental science and Engineering. (Environmental Management and Assessment)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0412-6845
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Sustainable development, Environmental science and Engineering. (Environmental Management and Assessment)
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Renewable & sustainable energy reviews, ISSN 1364-0321, E-ISSN 1879-0690, Vol. 189, article id 113856Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Considerable pressure is placed on wind power in Sweden due to the country’s goal of generating 100 % of its electricity from fossil free resources. The aim was to develop the REWIND methodological framework to support wind power planning, built on spatial multi-criteria analysis (SMCA). In addition, the purpose was to develop a conflict score as a novel component of this framework, for handling goal conflicts. This framework includes the scoping, design and evaluation stages. It was applied in a case study of Västernorrland County with extensive involvement of stakeholders throughout the process. 

The conflict score allows a separate analysis of trade-offs between factors, highlighting potential conflicts across the landscape to increase transparency. Thus, users are allowed to decide on a threshold on how much conflict among factors should be allowed for areas to qualify as planning alternatives. Critical issues that will need further attention concern quality and availability of data, creation of representative spatial indicators for the factors, weighting methods, and uncertainty analysis. The REWIND framework is open-ended and allows for further development to provide planning support that gives more control of factors and conflicts to be acceptable in real-world planning. Capacity building involving stakeholders in the design of planning alternatives are crucial. In Sweden, it can promote a more proactive planning process in the municipalities, supported by the regional actors, leading to a more predictable permitting process for developers. This will be useful for inclusive wind power planning in any country, since it is applicable on different scales.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV , 2024. Vol. 189, article id 113856
Keywords [en]
Wind power planning, spatial multi-criteria analysis, conflict score, Swedish wind power strategy
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Research subject
Land and Water Resources Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-337751DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113856ISI: 001102911700001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85174742094OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-337751DiVA, id: diva2:1803241
Funder
Swedish Energy AgencySwedish Environmental Protection AgencyStandUp
Note

QC 20231129

Available from: 2023-10-08 Created: 2023-10-08 Last updated: 2024-03-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Manolan Kandy, DeepaMörtberg, UllaWretling, VincentKuhlefelt, AnnaByström, GustafBalfors, Berit

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Manolan Kandy, DeepaMörtberg, UllaWretling, VincentKuhlefelt, AnnaByström, GustafBarney, AndrewBalfors, Berit
By organisation
Sustainable development, Environmental science and Engineering
In the same journal
Renewable & sustainable energy reviews
Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 279 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf