kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Lessons learnt from 20+years of research on multilevel governance of energy-efficient and zero-carbon buildings in the European Union
Linköping Univ, Dept Management & Engn, Div Polit Sci, Linköping, Sweden.;Ratio Inst, Stockholm, Sweden..
Linköping Univ, Dept Management & Engn, Div Polit Sci, Linköping, Sweden..ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5700-9706
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Industrial Economics and Management (Dept.), Management & Technology. Linköping Univ, Dept Management & Engn, Div Polit Sci, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8508-4212
2023 (English)In: Energy Efficiency, ISSN 1570-646X, E-ISSN 1570-6478, Vol. 16, no 8, article id 98Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

At global scale, the building sector accounts for 40% of total energy end use and almost 35% of greenhouse gas emissions. This makes it one of the most important sectors to focus on for reaching the 1.5-2 degrees C target of the Paris Agreement, to enhance energy security of supply and to alleviate energy poverty. The European Union (EU) is often seen as a leader in climate governance, which is also true for energy efficiency. The improvement of energy performance of buildings has been part of EU public policy for more than 50 years, making the EU a pioneer in the policy domain. Based on a semi-structured review of the scientific literature (N = 90), this paper is aimed at drawing the lessons from research on governance of energy-efficient and zero-carbon buildings in the EU. As for the findings, there is a multitude of policy instruments developed on different levels of governance, more or less integrated and managed by different actors and no single instrument is sufficient to stimulate energy-efficient and zero-carbon buildings. Five key challenges are identified in the governance literature examining the transition towards energy efficiency and zero-carbon buildings. An ambiguous leadership, heterogeneity of implementation, lack of incentives, limitations of non-regulatory policies and market-based instruments, and limited diffusion between governance levels. We also conclude that most policy instruments focus on new buildings which is problematic since the greatest challenge in the transition is the renovation of the large existing building stock.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature , 2023. Vol. 16, no 8, article id 98
Keywords [en]
Buildings, Energy efficiency, Governance, Multilevel governance, Policy instruments, Zero-carbon
National Category
Energy Systems
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-341822DOI: 10.1007/s12053-023-10178-6ISI: 001118570000002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85178239539OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-341822DiVA, id: diva2:1823704
Note

QC 20240103

Available from: 2024-01-03 Created: 2024-01-03 Last updated: 2024-01-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Nordensvärd, Johan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
von Malmborg, FredrikNordensvärd, Johan
By organisation
Management & Technology
In the same journal
Energy Efficiency
Energy Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 55 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf