kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Political ecology perspective for a new way of understanding stakeholders and value in infrastructure projects
The Bartlett School of Sustainable Construction, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK, 1-19 Torrington Place.
Engineering for International Development Centre, The Bartlett School of Sustainable Construction, University College London, UK.
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Sustainable development, Environmental science and Engineering, Strategic Sustainability Studies.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8614-3787
dKounkuey Design Initiative (KDI), Stockholm, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: International Journal of Project Management, ISSN 0263-7863, E-ISSN 1873-4634, Vol. 42, no 2, p. 102565-, article id 102565Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The long-term goals and objectives that infrastructure projects aim to deliver are contextualised by complex grand challenges, which involve an entanglement of economic, social, and ecological issues. However, there have been criticisms that infrastructure projects fall short of delivering equitable value to effectively address grand challenges. These criticisms underpinned the recent calls for rethinking the purpose and definition of infrastructure projects. This essay argues that adopting a political ecology perspective can be useful to start identifying the limitations of the current understandings of external stakeholders and value in infrastructure projects, which lead to the criticised shortcomings. Political ecology considers social, ecological, and economic issues as an assemblage that manifests through power relations. Thus, for project studies, it implies a reconceptualization of external stakeholders and project value around the notions of agency, vulnerability, and empowerment. This reconceptualization provides new theoretical and practical directions for project formation, stakeholder management and project leadership in the pursuit of rethinking the purpose and definition of infrastructure projects for effectively tackling the grand challenges of our times.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV , 2024. Vol. 42, no 2, p. 102565-, article id 102565
Keywords [en]
Infrastructure, Political ecology, Politics, Power, Stakeholder, Value
National Category
Social Anthropology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-344181DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2024.102565ISI: 001188962400001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85185711711OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-344181DiVA, id: diva2:1842901
Note

QC 20240307

Available from: 2024-03-06 Created: 2024-03-06 Last updated: 2024-04-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Mulligan, Joe

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mulligan, Joe
By organisation
Strategic Sustainability Studies
In the same journal
International Journal of Project Management
Social Anthropology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 129 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf