kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Gas storage in geological formations: A comparative review on carbon dioxide and hydrogen storage
School of Civil Engineering, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
School of Mechanical, Medicaland Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, QLD 4001, Australia.
James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom.
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences (SCI), Engineering Mechanics, Fluid Mechanics and Engineering Acoustics.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Materials Today Sustainability, E-ISSN 2589-2347, Vol. 26, article id 100720Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Carbon dioxide and hydrogen storage in geological formations at Gt scale are two promising strategies toward net-zero carbon emissions. To date, investigations into underground hydrogen storage (UHS) remain relatively limited in comparison to the more established knowledge body of underground carbon dioxide storage (UCS). Despite their analogous physical processes can be used for accelerating the advancements in UHS technology, the existing distinctions possibly may hinder direct applicability. This review therefore contributes to advancing our fundamental understanding on the key differences between UCS and UHS through multi-scale comparisons. These comparisons encompass key factors influencing underground gas storage, including storage media, trapping mechanisms, respective fluid properties, petrophysical properties, and injection scenarios. They provide guidance for the conversion of our existing knowledge from UCS to UHS, emphasizing the necessity of incorporating these factors relevant to their trapping and loss mechanisms. The article also outlines future directions to address the crucial knowledge gaps identified, aiming to enhance the utilisation of geological formations for hydrogen and carbon dioxide storage.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV , 2024. Vol. 26, article id 100720
Keywords [en]
Cyclic injection, Fluid properties, Geological storage materials, Petrophysical properties, Trapping mechanisms, Underground carbon dioxide storage, Underground hydrogen storage
National Category
Chemical Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-344597DOI: 10.1016/j.mtsust.2024.100720ISI: 001201461600001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85187221569OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-344597DiVA, id: diva2:1845985
Note

QC 20240503

Available from: 2024-03-20 Created: 2024-03-20 Last updated: 2025-02-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Suo, Si

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Suo, Si
By organisation
Fluid Mechanics and Engineering Acoustics
Chemical Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 44 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf