kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
On working gas rarefaction in high power impulse magnetron sputtering
Science Institute, University of Iceland, Dunhaga 3, IS-107 Reykjavik, Iceland, Dunhaga 3.
Leibniz Institute of Surface Engineering (IOM), Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany, Permoserstraße 15.
Science Institute, University of Iceland, Dunhaga 3, IS-107 Reykjavik, Iceland, Dunhaga 3.
Plasma and Coatings Physics Division, IFM-Materials Physics, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Plasma sources science & technology, ISSN 0963-0252, E-ISSN 1361-6595, Vol. 33, no 6, article id 065010Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The ionization region model (IRM) is applied to explore working gas rarefaction in high power impulse magnetron sputtering discharges operated with graphite, aluminum, copper, titanium, zirconium, and tungsten targets. For all cases the working gas rarefaction is found to be significant, the degree of working gas rarefaction reaches values of up to 83%. The various contributions to working gas rarefaction, including electron impact ionization, kick-out by the sputtered species or hot argon atoms, and diffusion, are evaluated and compared for the different target materials, and over a range of discharge current densities. The relative importance of the various processes varies between different target materials. In the case of a graphite target with argon as the working gas at 1 Pa, electron impact ionization (by both primary and secondary electrons) is the dominating contributor to working gas rarefaction, with over 90% contribution, while the contribution of sputter wind kick-out is small < 10 %. In the case of copper and tungsten targets, the kick-out dominates, with up to ∼60% contribution at 1 Pa. For metallic targets the kick-out is mainly due to metal atoms sputtered from the target, while for the graphite target the small kick-out contribution is mainly due to kick-out by hot argon atoms and to a smaller extent by carbon atoms. The main factors determining the relative contribution of the kick-out by the sputtered species to working gas rarefaction appear to be the sputter yield and the working gas pressure.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IOP Publishing , 2024. Vol. 33, no 6, article id 065010
Keywords [en]
high power impulse magnetron sputtering (HiPIMS), magnetron sputtering, sputter yield, sputtering
National Category
Atom and Molecular Physics and Optics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-348737DOI: 10.1088/1361-6595/ad53feISI: 001250438100001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85196357843OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-348737DiVA, id: diva2:1878647
Note

QC 20240627

Available from: 2024-06-27 Created: 2024-06-27 Last updated: 2024-07-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Raadu, Michael A.Brenning, NilsGudmundsson, Jon Tomas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Raadu, Michael A.Brenning, NilsGudmundsson, Jon Tomas
By organisation
Space and Plasma Physics
In the same journal
Plasma sources science & technology
Atom and Molecular Physics and Optics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 76 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf