kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A Comparison of Neural Networks for Wireless Channel Prediction
KTH, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), Computer Science, Network and Systems Engineering. Ericsson AB, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8499-9162
KTH, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), Intelligent systems, Decision and Control Systems (Automatic Control). Ericsson AB, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2289-3159
KTH, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), Computer Science, Network and Systems Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9810-3478
2024 (English)In: IEEE wireless communications, ISSN 1536-1284, E-ISSN 1558-0687, Vol. 31, no 3, p. 235-241Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The performance of modern wireless communications systems depends critically on the quality of the available channel state information (CSI) at the transmitter and receiver. Several previous works have proposed concepts and algorithms that help maintain high-quality CSI even in the presence of high mobility and channel aging, such as temporal prediction schemes that employ neural networks. However, it is still unclear which neural network-based scheme provides the best performance in terms of prediction quality, training complexity, and practical feasibility. To investigate such a question, this article first provides an overview of state-of-the-art neural networks applicable to channel prediction, and compares their performance in terms of prediction quality. Next, a new comparative analysis is proposed for five promising neural networks with different prediction horizons. The well-known tapped delay channel model recommended by the Third Generation Partnership Program is used for a standardized comparison among the neural networks. Based on this comparative evaluation, the advantages and disadvantages of each neural network are discussed, and guidelines for selecting the best-suited neural network in channel prediction applications are given.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) , 2024. Vol. 31, no 3, p. 235-241
National Category
Communication Systems
Research subject
Information and Communication Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-354775DOI: 10.1109/mwc.006.2300140ISI: 001167066600001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85184825622OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-354775DiVA, id: diva2:1905356
Note

QC 20241015

Available from: 2024-10-14 Created: 2024-10-14 Last updated: 2024-10-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Stenhammar, OscarFodor, GaborFischione, Carlo

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Stenhammar, OscarFodor, GaborFischione, Carlo
By organisation
Network and Systems EngineeringDecision and Control Systems (Automatic Control)
In the same journal
IEEE wireless communications
Communication Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 236 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf