kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Less to produce and less to consume: the advantage of pure question-based learning
KTH, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), Human Centered Technology, Media Technology and Interaction Design, MID.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3845-5468
KTH, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), Human Centered Technology, Media Technology and Interaction Design, MID.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5626-1187
Independent Researcher, Hässelby, Sweden.
KTH, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), Computer Science, Theoretical Computer Science, TCS.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8996-0221
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Interactive Learning Environments, ISSN 1049-4820, E-ISSN 1744-5191, p. 1-22Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

This study is the first to investigate how an online course consisting solely of multiple-choice questions and detailed formative feedback comparesto an online course format that was previously shown to be highlyeffective. Specifically, a pure question-based learning (pQBL) version ofa course was compared to a question-based learning course (QBL)which consisted of the same questions and feedback as the pQBLcourse, but also included ordinary texts about the subject. To explorehow pQBL and QBL compared in terms of learning outcomes andcompletion time, 492 employees at the Swedish Employment Agencywere randomized to either a pQBL or a QBL version of a course aboutIT security. The results indicate that the pQBL course resulted in equallygood or better learning outcomes compared to the QBL course. Thisresult was robust to changes in how course quality was defined. Inaddition, participants completed the pQBL course slightly faster.Because a pQBL course requires less resources to produce, there arebenefits to relying on the pQBL method when teachers or studentshave limited time. Further benefits that come with the flexibility of thepQBL method are discussed

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis Group, 2024. p. 1-22
Keywords [en]
Question-based learning, active learning, formativefeedback, doer effect
National Category
Educational Sciences
Research subject
Education and Communication in the Technological Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-360341DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2024.2362830ISI: 001247707400001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85195687874OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-360341DiVA, id: diva2:1940067
Note

QC 20250225

Available from: 2025-02-25 Created: 2025-02-25 Last updated: 2025-02-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Jemstedt, AndreasBälter, OlofGlassey, RichardBosk, Daniel

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jemstedt, AndreasBälter, OlofGlassey, RichardBosk, Daniel
By organisation
Media Technology and Interaction Design, MIDTheoretical Computer Science, TCS
In the same journal
Interactive Learning Environments
Educational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 59 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf