kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Balancing Application Relevant and Sparsity Revealing Excitation in Input Design
KTH, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), Intelligent systems, Decision and Control Systems (Automatic Control).ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1520-4041
KTH, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), Intelligent systems, Decision and Control Systems (Automatic Control).ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0355-2663
KTH, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), Intelligent systems, Decision and Control Systems (Automatic Control).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9368-3079
2025 (English)In: IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, ISSN 0018-9286, E-ISSN 1558-2523, Vol. 70, no 3, p. 1890-1897Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The maximum absolute correlation between regressors, which is called mutual coherence, plays an essential role in sparse estimation. A regressor matrix whose columns are highly correlated may result from optimal input design, since there is no constraint on the mutual coherence, making it difficult to handle sparse estimation. This article aims to tackle this issue for fixed denominator models, which include Laguerre, Kautz, and generalized orthonormal basis function expansion models, for example. The article proposes an optimal input design method where the achieved Fisher information matrix (FIM) is fitted to the desired Fisher matrix, together with a coordinate transformation designed to make the regressors in the transformed coordinates have low mutual coherence. The method can be used together with any sparse estimation method and any desired Fisher matrix. A numerical study shows its potential for alleviating the problem of model order selection when used in conjunction with, for example, classical methods such as the Akaike information criterion.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) , 2025. Vol. 70, no 3, p. 1890-1897
Keywords [en]
Coherence, Sparse matrices, Estimation, Vectors, Numerical models, System identification, Computational modeling, Accuracy, Matrix converters, Matching pursuit algorithms, Input design, mutual coherence, sparse estimation
National Category
Control Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-361625DOI: 10.1109/TAC.2024.3472168ISI: 001435459500013Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-86000427337OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-361625DiVA, id: diva2:1946964
Note

QC 20250324

Available from: 2025-03-24 Created: 2025-03-24 Last updated: 2025-03-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Parsa, JavadRojas, Cristian R.Hjalmarsson, Håkan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Parsa, JavadRojas, Cristian R.Hjalmarsson, Håkan
By organisation
Decision and Control Systems (Automatic Control)
In the same journal
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
Control Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 28 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf