Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Discussion on the approximations made in the practical implementation of the remove compute restore technique in regional geoid modelling
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Transport and Economics, Geodesy.
2005 (English)In: Journal of Geodesy, ISSN 0949-7714, E-ISSN 1432-1394, Vol. 78, no 11-12, 645-653 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The remove-compute-restore (RCR) technique is the most well known method for regional gravimetric geoid determination today. Its basic theory is the first-order approximation of either Molodensky’s method for quasi-geoid determination or the classical geoid modelling by Helmert’s second method of condensing the topography onto the geoid. Although the basic approximate formulae do not meet today’s demands for a 1-cm geoid, it is sometimes assumed that the removal of the less precise long-wavelength terrestrial gravity anomaly field from Stokes’s integral by utilising a higher-order reference field represented by a more precise Earth gravity model (EGM) and the restoration of the EGM as a low-degree geoid contribution will produce a geoid model of the desired accuracy. Further improvement is achieved also by removing and restoring a residual topographic effect, which favourably smoothes the gravity anomaly to be integrated in Stokes’s formula. However, it is shown here that the RCR technique fails to tune down the long-wavelength gravity signal from the terrestrial data, and the EGM actually only reduces, in a non-optimised way, the truncation error committed by limiting the Stokes integration to a small region around the computation point. Hence, in order to take full advantage of a precise EGM, especially one from new dedicated satellite gravimetry, Stokes’s kernel must be modified in a suitable way to match the errors of terrestrial gravity, EGM and truncation. In addition, topographic, atmospheric and ellipsoidal effects must be carefully applied.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2005. Vol. 78, no 11-12, 645-653 p.
Keyword [en]
Regional geoid modelling, Remove–compute–restore (RCR) technique
National Category
Physical Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-10815DOI: 10.1007/s00190-004-0430-1ISI: 000229856700001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-20444407955OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-10815DiVA: diva2:228017
Note
QC 20100823Available from: 2009-07-22 Created: 2009-07-22 Last updated: 2017-12-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sjöberg, Lars
By organisation
Geodesy
In the same journal
Journal of Geodesy
Physical Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 39 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf