Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evaluating of robust techniques in suppressing the impact of outliers in a deformation monitoring network: A case study on the Teheran Milad tower network
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Transport and Economics, Geodesy.
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Transport and Economics, Geodesy.
2007 (English)In: Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Hungaria, ISSN 1217-8977, Vol. 42, no 4, 449-463 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The problem of handling outliers in a deformation monitoring network is of special importance, because the existence of outliers may lead to false deformation parameters. One of the approaches to detect the outliers is to use robust estimators. In this case the network points are computed by such a robust method, implying that the adjustment result is resisting systematic observation errors, and, in particular, it is insensitive to gross errors and even blunders. Since there are different approaches to robust estimation, the resulting estimated networks may differ. In this article, different robust estimation methods, such as the M-estimation of Huber, the "Danish", and the L-1-norm estimation methods, are reviewed and compared with the standard least squares method to view their potentials to detect outliers in the Tehran Milad tower deformation network. The numerical studies show that the L-1-norm is able to detect and down-weight the outliers best, so it is selected as the favourable approach, but there is a lack of uniqueness. For comparison, Baarda's method "data snooping" can achieve similar results when the outlier magnitude of an outlier is large enough to be detected; but robust methods are faster than the sequential data snooping process.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2007. Vol. 42, no 4, 449-463 p.
Keyword [en]
geodetic network, least squares, Milad tower, outlier detection, robust estimation
National Category
Earth and Related Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-10842DOI: 10.1556/AGeod.42.2007.4.6ISI: 000258337900006Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-38749153165OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-10842DiVA: diva2:228128
Note
QC 20100914Available from: 2009-07-24 Created: 2009-07-24 Last updated: 2010-09-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eshagh, MehdiSjöberg, LarsKiamehr, Ramin
By organisation
Geodesy
Earth and Related Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 57 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf