Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Globalisation of corporate knowledge formation: enabling proximity through organisational coordination mechanisms
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Industrial Economics and Management (Dept.), Industrial Dynamics. (Industriell Dynamik)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2932-4335
(English)In: Industry and Innovation, ISSN 1366-2716, E-ISSN 1469-8390Article in journal (Refereed) In press
Abstract [en]

This paper connects to a stream of literature that emphasises the importance of effective utilization of dispersed knowledge in the MNC organisation. It also connects to the recent developments of the proximity concept, primarily driven by economic geographers. The paper seeks to contribute further to our understanding of the relationship between proximity and the management of corporate knowledge formation. In particular, the intention is to review the organisational coordination mechanisms and their potential to create additional dimensions of proximity than the geographical proximity that comes with co-location of corporate activities. From both theory and empirical studies it can be concluded that proximity matters, also in long-distance relationships. However, the findings in this study disagree with the strong focus on (permanent) geographical proximity. Drawing on the experiences of distributed R&D from a case study of a Swedish-based multinational company, the paper points to the role of coordination mechanisms as an important tool to create other dimensions of proximity in the distributed organisation.

Keyword [en]
knowledge formation, proximity, coordination mechanisms
National Category
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-10927OAI: diva2:232315
QC 20100715Available from: 2009-08-21 Created: 2009-08-21 Last updated: 2010-07-16Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Creating Advantage: On the complexity of industrial knowledge formation in the knowledge-based economy
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Creating Advantage: On the complexity of industrial knowledge formation in the knowledge-based economy
2009 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Knowledge as a resource and knowledge formation as a process are seen as central to providing nations and regions as well as firms with a competitive advantage. This is captured by the view that the economic and industrial landscape is currently undergoing a transformation towards a knowledge-based economy. This dissertation engages with two views that have gained great influence in the discussions – in academia as well as in policy – on this industrial transformation. This concerns the view on which types of knowledge formation processes that are seen to actually provide a competitive advantage. There is today a prevailing tendency to connect the creation of competitive advantage to research-intensive, so-called high-tech, activities. It also concerns the view on where these knowledge formation processes take place. Much inspired by innovative and high-tech regions, competitive advantage is often closely associated with the role of geographical proximity for knowledge formation. The aim of this dissertation is to develop our understanding of the role of those knowledge formation processes that currently fall outside what is captured by these prevailing views. Three research questions are addressed. First, what is the role of non-research intensive knowledge formation processes in the creation of competitive advantage? Second, how can knowledge formation processes connected to the creation of regional competitive advantage be promoted? Third, what is the role of proximity in knowledge formation processes in the creation of competitive advantage? A qualitative case study approach is adopted for the empirical part of the research, consisting of one case study where low- and medium-tech industrial activities are studied and one case study where the regional dimension of knowledge formation is studied. Personal interviews constitute the major part of the empirical material. The research findings give evidence that reveals shortcomings in theory as well as in policy practice in regards both these prevailing views. It is shown that low- and medium-tech activities are still highly relevant, not only on their own but for the industry as a whole. Further, current forces of globalisation call for an approach to regional development that includes a dual focus of strengthening regional connections as well as facilitating and promoting extra-regional connections. This is particularly important in small, open economies such as Sweden. Further, the finings are in line with those requesting a multidimensional approach to the concept of proximity – one that regards proximity not only as a concept with geographical connotation but also with reference to proximity in context, cognition or value-systems. The dissertation suggests instead that an approach to industrial activities that assumes that those firms, regions and countries that can manage complex knowledge formation processes may develop competitive advantages. It is this ability to achieve and manage sticky processes in a slippery world that is essential for the creation of competitive advantage. And we are more likely to identify these particular competitive advantages on the firm level than on the industry level. Within every industry, there are firms that can manage more suitable ‘bundles’ of knowledge bases, network connections etc, which enable them to adapt at a lesser cost (costs can for instance be measured in terms of efforts, money or time) than other firms within the same industry. This is important to acknowledge – in policy as well as in theory – in order to not exclude important parts of what contributes to industrial competitive advantage in the knowledge-based economy.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: KTH, 2009. vii, 52 p.
Trita-IEO, ISSN 1100-7982 ; 2009:05
knowledge formation, competitive advantage, complexity, proximity, regional innovation systems policy, low- and medium-technology industries
National Category
Other Mechanical Engineering
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-10928 (URN)978-91-7415-333-0 (ISBN)
Public defence
2009-06-11, F3, Lindstedtsvägen 26, KTH, Stockholm, 13:00 (English)
QC 20100715Available from: 2009-08-28 Created: 2009-08-21 Last updated: 2010-07-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gustavsson, Linda
By organisation
Industrial Dynamics
In the same journal
Industry and Innovation
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 50 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link