Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Tactile Perception - Role of Physical Properties
KTH, School of Chemical Science and Engineering (CHE), Chemistry. (Ytkemi)
2010 (English)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The aim of this thesis is to interconnect human tactile perception with various physical properties of materials. Tactile perception necessitates contact and relative motion between the skin and the surfaces of interest. This implies that properties such as friction and surface roughness ought to be important physical properties for tactile sensing. In this work, a method to measure friction between human fingers and surfaces is presented. This method is believed to best represent friction in tactile perception.

This study is focused on the tactile perception of printing papers. However, the methodology of finger friction measurements, as well as the methodology to link physical properties with human perception data, can be applied to almost whichever material or surfaces.

 

This thesis is based on three articles.

 

In Article I, one participant performed finger friction measurements, using a piezoelectric force sensor, on 21 printing papers of different paper grades and grammage (weight of the papers). Friction coefficients were calculated as the ratio of the frictional force and the normal force, shown to have a linear relationship. The values were recorded while stroking the index finger over the surface. The results show that measurements with the device can be used to discriminate a set of similar surfaces in terms of finger friction. When comparing the friction coefficients, the papers group according to paper surface treatment and an emerging trend is that the rougher (uncoated) papers have a lower friction coefficient than the smoother (coated) papers. In the latter case, this is interpreted in terms of a larger contact between the finger and paper surface.

 

In addition, a decrease in friction coefficient is noted for all papers on repeated stroking, where the coated papers display a larger decrease. XPS (X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy) reveals that skin lipids are transferred from the finger to the paper surface, acting as a lubricant and hence decrease friction. Nevertheless, there is evidence that mechanical changes of the surface cannot be completely ruled out.

 

The reproducibility of the finger friction measurements is elaborated in Article II, by using many participants on a selection of eight printing papers out of the 21. The trends in friction are the same; once again, the coated papers display the highest friction. There are notably large variations in the exact value of the friction coefficient, which are tentatively attributed to different skin hydration and stroking modes.

 

These same participants also took part in a tactile study of perceived paper coarseness (“strävhet” in Swedish). The results reveal that the participants can distinguish a set of printing papers in terms of perceived coarseness. Not unexpectedly, surface roughness appears to be an important property related to perceived coarseness, where group data display that perceived coarseness increases with increasing surface roughness. Interestingly, friction also appears to be a discriminatory property for some subjects. A few participants showed opposite trends, which is evidence for that what is considered coarse is subjective and that different participants “weigh” the importance of the properties differently. This is a good example of a challenge when measuring one-dimensional perceptions in psychophysics.

 

In Article III, a multidimensional approach was used to explore the tactile perception of printing papers. To do this, the participants scaled similarity among all possible pairs of the papers, and this similarity data are best presented by a three-dimensional space solution. This means that there are three underlying dimensions or properties that the participants use to discriminate the surface feel. Also, there is a distinct perceptual difference between the rougher (uncoated) and smoother (coated) papers. The surface roughness appears to be the dominant physical property when discriminating between a real rough paper and a smooth paper, whereas friction, thermal conductivity and grammage are more important when discriminating among the smooth coated papers.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: KTH , 2010. , xiii, 56 p.
Series
Trita-CHE-Report, ISSN 1654-1081 ; 2010:2
Keyword [en]
Finger Friction, Skin Friction, Paper Friction, Friction Coefficient, Piezoelectric Force Sensor, Skin Tribology, Biotribology, Soft Tribology, Surface Roughness, Profilometry, Coated Paper, Uncoated Paper, Printing Paper, Magazine Paper, Tactile Perception, Psychophysics, Multidimensional Scaling, Magnitude Estimation, Paper Coarseness, Thermal Conductivity, X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy.
National Category
Other Basic Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-11891ISBN: 978-91-7415-533-4 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-11891DiVA: diva2:287821
Presentation
2010-02-12, Sal E3, Osquarsbacke 14, KTH, Stockholm, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2010-01-26 Created: 2010-01-19 Last updated: 2011-03-24Bibliographically approved
List of papers
1. Finger Friction Measurements on Coated and Uncoated Printing Papers
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Finger Friction Measurements on Coated and Uncoated Printing Papers
Show others...
2010 (English)In: Tribology letters, ISSN 1023-8883, E-ISSN 1573-2711, Vol. 37, no 2, 389-399 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A macroscopic finger friction device consisting of a piezoelectric force sensor was evaluated on 21 printing papers of different paper grades and grammage. Friction between a human finger and the 21 papers was measured and showed that measurements with the device can be used to discriminate a set of similar surfaces in terms of finger friction. When comparing the friction coefficients, the papers group according to paper grade and the emerging trend is that the rougher papers have a lower friction coefficient than smoother papers. This is interpreted in terms of a larger contact area in the latter case. Furthermore, a decrease in friction coefficient is noted for all papers on repeated stroking (15 cycles back and forth with the finger). Complementary experiments indicate that both mechanical and chemical modifications of the surface are responsible for this decrease: (1) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy measurements show that lipid material is transferred from the finger to the paper surface, (2) repeated finger friction measurements on the same paper sample reveal that only partial recovery of the frictional behaviour occurs and (3) profilometry measurements before and after stroking indicate small topographical changes associated with repeated frictional contacts.

Keyword
Biotribology, Coated paper, Finger friction, Friction test methods, Paper friction, Perception, Skin friction, Surface roughness, Tactile feel, Uncoated paper
National Category
Chemical Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-11930 (URN)10.1007/s11249-009-9538-z (DOI)000274222300031 ()2-s2.0-77649237221 (Scopus ID)
Funder
Swedish Research CouncilKnut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
Note

QC 20110126

Available from: 2010-01-27 Created: 2010-01-26 Last updated: 2017-12-12Bibliographically approved
2. Reproducibility of finger friction, surface roughness and perception of printing papers
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Reproducibility of finger friction, surface roughness and perception of printing papers
Show others...
(English)Article in journal (Other academic) Submitted
Keyword
finger friction, paper friction, roughness, perception
National Category
Other Basic Medicine
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-31703 (URN)
Note
QS 2011Available from: 2011-03-24 Created: 2011-03-24 Last updated: 2011-12-15Bibliographically approved
3. Multidimensional psychophysics: surface feel of printing paper as a function of physical properties
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Multidimensional psychophysics: surface feel of printing paper as a function of physical properties
Show others...
(English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
Keyword
hapic, human perception, touch, multidimensional, surface feel
National Category
Other Basic Medicine
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-31706 (URN)
Note
QC 20110324Available from: 2011-03-24 Created: 2011-03-24 Last updated: 2011-03-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(7028 kB)959 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 7028 kBChecksum SHA-512
03efc2b1ed6ae88e9fb565933faaf038c8f1770daeb09cbb619aae696a3c4775a426cb2421f290edc02320492335dcbf282eccfbf3ad5fe3605f16a70d27b76d
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Skedung, Lisa
By organisation
Chemistry
Other Basic Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 959 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 1886 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf