Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
The precautionary principle is incoherent
2006 (English)In: Risk Analysis, ISSN 0272-4332, E-ISSN 1539-6924, Vol. 26, no 3, 595-601 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This article argues that no version of the precautionary principle can be reasonably applied to decisions that may lead to fatal outcomes. In support of this strong claim, a number of desiderata are proposed, which reasonable rules for rational decision making ought to satisfy. Thereafter, two impossibility theorems are proved, showing that no version of the precautionary principle can satisfy the proposed desiderata. These theorems are directly applicable to recent discussions of the precautionary principle in medicine, biotechnology, environmental management, and related fields. The impossibility theorems do not imply, however, that the precautionary principle is of no relevance at all in policy discussions. Even if it is not a reasonable rule for rational decision making, it is possible to interpret the precautionary principle in other ways, e.g., as an argumentative tool or as an epistemic principle favoring a reversed burden of proof.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2006. Vol. 26, no 3, 595-601 p.
Keyword [en]
decision theory, impossibility theorem, precautionary principle, rational choice
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-15762ISI: 000238442900007OAI: diva2:333804
QC 20100525Available from: 2010-08-05 Created: 2010-08-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Peterson, Martin
In the same journal
Risk Analysis

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 27 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link